dChan
Anonymous ID: 5765af June 17, 2022, 3:23 a.m. No.16460878   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0962 >>0966

This lawyer must belong to Lawfare, its pretty sad radical lawyers don’t understand the laws or constitutional rights!

 

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1537646194910023681?s=20&t=dVWBWMqfuHx1sxPM61BUyA

Anonymous ID: 5765af June 17, 2022, 3:51 a.m. No.16460960   🗄️.is 🔗kun

And the destruction of food plants and farns etc started to accelerate whenBidan came out from G7 meeting stating we are going yo have food shortages. It was the plan

 

https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1537562055124959237?s=20&t=dVWBWMqfuHx1sxPM61BUyA

Anonymous ID: 5765af June 17, 2022, 4:01 a.m. No.16460990   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1002

Avenatti stacking more charges and jail time. But he’s going to be President some day! Kek. If you think about if Joe can be President, then Avenatti could be.

 

https://twitter.com/AP/status/1537511781840703488?s=20&t=dVWBWMqfuHx1sxPM61BUyA

Anonymous ID: 5765af June 17, 2022, 4:22 a.m. No.16461045   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1048 >>1069

Justice Department Colludes With Congress to Bolster the ‘Insurrection’ Narrative

Part 1 of 2

This week produced yet another example of the shameless collaboration between the U.S. Department of Justice, the Democratic Party, and the national news media to destroy Donald Trump and everyone around him. The ink was barely dry on the not guilty verdict for Michael Sussmann, just one of many figures who acted as a pass-through between Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the FBI to manufacture the Russia collusion hoax, before the same players were up to their old tricks.

Members of the January 6 select committee blanketed the Sunday news programs last weekend promising bombshell revelations would shake the nation during a primetime hearing Thursday night. Representative Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) told CBS News’ Robert Costa the committee would present findings to show an “extremely broad . . . extremely well-organized” conspiracy to overthrow the government that day. What the committee uncovered related to the alleged conspiracy, Cheney warned, is “really chilling.’

 

Roughly 24 hours after Cheney’s interview aired, Matthew Graves, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia handling the January 6 criminal prosecution, announced seditious conspiracy charges against five members of the Proud Boys, the so-called militia group involved in the Capitol protest. The new indictment, handed down by a D.C. grand jury 13 months after its initial indictments in the case, made instant headlines.

 

But the 32-page indictment contained no new information aside from a few irrelevant details; much of it rehashed previous filings in the case. Nonetheless, Graves claimed the men conspired to “oppose the lawful transfer of presidential power by force, by opposing the authority of the Government of the United States and by preventing, hindering, or delaying by force the execution of the laws governing the transfer of powerful,” referring to the 12th Amendment to the Constitution.

 

No American has ever been convicted of “seditious conspiracy.” The last time the government attempted to prosecute a seditious conspiracy case 10 years ago, the presiding judge tossed it out of court. Graves has so farcharged 17 Americanswith the rare offense comparable to treason and threatening life sentences for those who refuse to accept plea deals.

 

The purpose of the one-two punch by Cheney and Graves was revealed by the New York Times on Tuesday: committee members will present to the audience proof of an alleged “conspiracy” between Trump and the unarmed Proud Boys to execute a coup on January 6.

 

“A significant portion of the first hearing on Thursday evening will focus on the Proud Boys, a far-right group whose members have been charged with seditious conspiracy in connection with the storming of the Capitol,” reporters Annie Karni and Luke Broadwater wrote. “It is scheduled to include testimony from a documentary filmmaker, Nick Quested, who was embedded with the group during the storming of the building, and a Capitol Police officer, Caroline Edwards, who was injured in an assault said to be triggered by the Proud Boys.”

 

A follow-up story in the Wall Street Journal elaborated on the committee’s plans. “The committee is likely to feature previously unseen footage Mr. Quested’s crew filmed of the Jan. 6 attack, according to Mr. Quested. The filmmaker was recording as a Proud Boy member pushed barricades on top of Capitol Police officers, he said,” Scott Patterson wrote on June 8.

 

https://amgreatness.com/2022/06/09/justice-department-colludes-with-congress-to-bolster-the-insurrection-narrative/

Anonymous ID: 5765af June 17, 2022, 4:23 a.m. No.16461048   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16461045

Part 2 of 2

 

So, how will the committee tie this to Trump? No doubt the former ABC News producer hired to create a dramatic video montage of footage recorded that day and witness interviews will feature a clip of Trump’s comment during a September 2020 debate with Joe Biden related to the Proud Boys.

 

Debate moderator Chris Wallace, who claimed disingenously and without evidence that Proud Boys incited violence during the 2020 George Floyd riots, repeatedly pushed Trump to tell the group to “stand down” while Joe Biden added on, “say it, do it, say it!” When Trump asked both who they specifically wanted him to condemn, Biden answered, “Proud Boys.” So Trump, looking directly at the camera, complied. “Proud Boys, stand back and stand by.”

 

That comment—Trump later said he didn’t know who the Proud Boys were—much like his “very fine people” remark after the 2017 protests in Charlottesville, has been taken out of context ever since. Committee members and the media will once again weaponize an intentionally twisted version of his comment as evidence Trump instructed the Proud Boys to prepare to “storm” the U.S. Capitol on January 6.

 

The collaboration between the Justice Department, House Democrats, and the media did not go unnoticed by two of the Proud Boy defendants. In a motion filed on Wednesday, Enrique Tarrio, the leader of the group, and Zachary Rehl, noted the timing of their indictment.

 

“The government filed the Third Superseding Indictment on June 6, 2022 to coincide with the January 6th Select Committee Hearings which are scheduled to commence on June 9, 2022 on prime-time TV,” their attorneys explained to Judge Timothy Kelly, the presiding judge in the case. “Additionally, the select Committee has announced that the hearings will commence immediately and with the central focus of Enrique Tarrio and the Proud Boys. This suspiciously seems orchestrated at the highest levels of government. This Honorable Court should raise caution as to the true intent of why the Government filed a Third Superseding with trumped up allegations with no new supporting facts on the eve of the January 6th Select Committee Hearings.”

 

The attorneys further argued the government added “no new material facts to the allegations.”

 

But of course facts don’t matter in Collaboration Theater. The same powerful, unaccountable interests that concocted Russiagate, rigged the 2020 election, and conspired to produce the events of January 6 depend only on the bloodlust of the Democratic Party base and the insatiable vengeance of party leaders such as Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Liz Cheney to promote their lies. And now they get to do it in primetime.

 

https://amgreatness.com/2022/06/09/justice-department-colludes-with-congress-to-bolster-the-insurrection-narrative/

Anonymous ID: 5765af June 17, 2022, 4:30 a.m. No.16461066   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The Jan. 6 Committee’s Targeting Of Ginni Thomas Is Despicable

BY: DAVID HARSANYI

 

Jan. 6 Committee Chair Bennie Thompson says it’s “time” to drag Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, in front of his partisan panel so they can grill her over some private text messages and emails. To this point, Thompson hasn’t presented a scintilla of evidence implicating Ginni Thomas in any illegality, nor any evidence that she was in favor of rioting or violence.

 

Thomas isn’t an elected official, she wasn’t running for office or working for the administration, nor was she imbued with supernatural powers that could compel anyone to act against their will or the Constitution. As a private citizen she was petitioning officials to engage in the political act of challenging election results—something Democrats regularly do. As my colleague Tristan Justice has pointed out, not a single of the 29 texts exchanged between Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and Thomas (of more than 2,300 text messages released to the committee) included a single direct reference to her husband or any other justice.

 

Interactions between the White House and justices’ wives might be fair game for journalists—the same journalists, incidentally, who methodically avoid investigating interactions between the president of the United States and his shady son—but a private citizen’s opinions are none of Congress’s concern. Indeed, justices’ wives aren’t stripped of their right to free expression simply because it upsets Bennie Thompson. Democrats want to force Thomas to testify so they can keep tenuously cobbling together as many unrelated acts as possible in an effort to create the impression that there was a widespread coup. Every day proves that contention more risible.

 

The second, perhaps more important reason in attempting to paint Ginni Thomas’ political activism as part of nefarious, violent plot, is to pressure her husband into recusing himself from cases involving the executive branch. And if that fails, it gives leftists fodder to accuse Thomas of corruption. Justice Elena Kagan is free to help coordinate the defense of Obamacare while solicitor general and then rule on the same law. Justice Stephen Breyer is free to act as the Senate Judiciary Committee’s chief counsel on sentencing guidelines and then rule on his own work.

 

Ruth Bader Ginsburg could rule on a slew of issues she had taken public positions on while working for the ACLU. But Clarence Thomas’s wife can’t have opinions. The claim that Clarence Thomas has any legal obligation to recuse himself from any cases because his wife has opinions is a fabrication, as Andy McCarthy explained:

 

The statute that governs judicial disqualification, Section 455 (of Title 28, U.S. Code), extensively addressesrecusal on the basis of a spouse’s potential connection to matters in litigation. Essentially, the triggers involve financial or legal stakes in the matter, or some connection to the matter as an attorney. Ginni Thomas’s conservative political activism — up to and including the text messages to Mark Meadows about the 2020 election — does not activate those triggers. If it did, many judges appointed by Democrats would have been disqualified from cases over which they’ve presided despite the political and legal activism of their spouses.

 

Clarence Thomas is the most straightforward jurist of the modern age. The notion that he is in bag for any partisan special interest is preposterous beyond words. And that’s the real problem for liberals. The intense loathing of Thomas by the left is propelled by his unadorned adherence to the Constitution and his reluctance to concoct rights or bow to vagaries of the public pressure. Nothing deters the progressive project more than those traits.

 

The Jan. 6 Committee, stocked with its own mendacious conspiracy theorists and election deniers like Adam Schiff—a committee that denied the duly elected opposition the ability to name members it wanted—is targeting private citizens for wrongthinkin an effort to undermine the court on issues completely unrelated to Jan 6. The left’s concerted political efforts to delegitimize and intimidate the court are a more dangerous long-term threat to our institutions than anything Jan. 6 rioters could ever have accomplished.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2022/06/16/the-jan-6-committees-targeting-of-ginni-thomas-is-despicable/