>>1646187

>"baphomet pose"?!

WTF is this Clownery?

>>1646328

>D5

>droga5

>global advertising firm in New York and London with all sorts of cabal/occult ties, nobody is paying attention.

Well, you should let the evidence speak for itself instead of injecting your own profound ignorance or out-right CLOWNERY into it. (SEE GRAPHIC).

The best known painting of Baphomet doesn’t surface until 1856.

The claims of an idol named Baphomet were unique to the Inquisition of the Templars in the 1300’s. However, It is significant that "no specific evidence [of Baphomet] appears in either the Templar Rule or in other medieval period Templar documents."

Modern scholars such as Peter Partner and Malcolm Barber agree that the name of Baphomet was an Old French corruption of the name Muhammad. BULLSHIT CLOWNERY CONCOCTED by the Inquisitors as heresy. Alain Demurger, rejects the idea that the Templars could have adopted the doctrines of their enemies. Helen Nicholson writes that the charges were essentially "manipulative"—the Templars "were accused of becoming fairy-tale Muslims." Medieval Christians believed that Muslims were idolatrous and worshipped Muhammad as a god, with mahomet becoming mammet in English, meaning an idol or false god.

IT WAS CLOWNERY DURING THE INQUISITION AND ITS CLOWNERY NOW

>>1647053

>that poster calling me a clown is the clown.

Im not a CLOWN, I just get suspicious when someone comes in here posting a picture with "baphemet pose" in red over the most valuable piece of Art in History. Why would the company doing the advertising for this painting for auction put this over it on their Instagram?? Doesn't make any sense to me.

Maybe they are EVIL, but I would just make sure that is not some fake account misrepresenting them. But, my point wasn't to deter anyone from investigating them. So, by all means please do.