>>16473685
>https://web.archive.org/save/https://8kun.top/hivemind/res/19105.html
I appreciate the copy+pasta, but this isn't an actual archive, but the URL to archive something.
>>16473688
>copy+pasta the same over and over - totally not spam
>it saysOFF-TOPICbecause I posted it in the meta thread after posting it in a regular thread already
The meta thread as simple to understand rules.
"It appears Austin Steinbart is "Sgt. B""
is off-topic in meta. Simple as that. The ban message even says it.
You can post that shit in regular threads and it isn't deleted and you already did and you know it.
>>16472972, >>16471159,
Now this is weird, in any case, wayback machine forwards to an archive URL and /save/ is not an archive itself.
The correct URL would be
https://web.archive.org/web/20220619212013/https://8kun.top/hivemind/res/19105.html
Using https://web.archive.org/save/ you create archives.
And in fact I use these type of URLs to create archives.
>>16473766
hivemind links are indeed off-topic in there, but nice try trying to get these in any chance you get.
copy+pasta the same over and over == spam, and could get deleted everywhere else, but isn't.
>profit off of anons
How does he do that again?
Hey you attack basically everyone including Jim, why don't you attack Q as well?
And why don't I see anything productive coming from these kind of posters? Always just attacks and /hivemind/. Y?
>>16473819
>$1000 a month subscriptions
Where do I order these now?
I don't remember paying Jim or anyone else involved anything.
>keep deleting
I don't delete shit including your shit, despite it glowing so hard I need sunglasses.
Your narrative: "Jim is comp'd, and Arizona and whatever".
Ok, at the same time "muh hivemind".
That makes no sense.
If you actually meant it, you would go SOMEWHERE ELSE.
And if Jim was so bad, he would have closed hivemind down, especially when all you are doing is going here to attack anons and crew and Jim himself, pretending that it's so bad, when all you actually did last year was ban bakers + anons left + right, and anyone doing anything productive.
Y?
>>16473866
I don't see a single post in there that is signed with "Q", so why is it "fake Q posts"? There is no username set either.
And I remember actual fake Q posts on here, with username fuckery, which is why the tripcode color animation was added.
So what you are saying is that you are not allowed on your so called free speech board to post in a certain way, is that it?
And anyone ARCHIVING your deletions is bad as well?
Y?
>This is Q research, Not Jim Watkins, Babyfist and Austin Steinbart Research.
So you say that their posts are off-topic.
Got it.
But you said this is not Jim Watkins research.
Is Jim attacking this very board?
No, THEY are.
THEY are in fact attacking Q's board.
Everyone is a Jew. Everyone is comp'd, except them of course, meanwhile they delete posts like pic related.
There were quite obviously military posts on here. Why would they delete things like that?
And why do they complain now when literally any post is touched at all?
Checked.
Actually they admitted that themselves in a meta-post, where they literally said "most snons don't want drama".
None of what they are saying makes sense:
-
nooo, don't delete anything, nothing is spam, all is very valuable posts especially the bot posts spamming the board, admin is comp'd when they delete anything at all
-
admin has to show us what they deleted
-
but Jim must delete the B post, because reasons, Jim is comp'd because he doesn't do so
They themselves:
-
everyone calling us out is a Jew and gets banned + deleted
-
all bakers get banned too
-
some posts are just deleted because of their formatting or style, nvm that military is posting on here
-
anyone who archives these is comp'd
-
but we good guys here
I'm sure if Jim would have deleted the B post, they would be going "noooo, Jim comp'd because he deleted that post".
They are basically acting like Democrats.
>If I hear that JEW crap again, I'll just filter you next time,
What Jew crap?
My post was about them here, the ASS-crew, calling everyone that called them out last year Jews and other names and banned them.
>Yep it would be easier to (pic related)
>but I still argue it's not all Jews are bad.
My stand point is that some evil people USE Jewish people AS A SHIELD.
>pretends to be unable to detect sarcasm
>doesn't screenshot the convo
>>16458998 (meta)
>That is not Jim. Jim does not control 8kun anymore.
>>16459001 (meta)
>who the fuck is it then?
A joke is to unironically say that Jim Watkins would not be in control of 8kun anymore.
>with control I meant something else
Here comes the next hoax.
That could have been the case for years already. In fact nothing is safe, because every anon on here can be labelled a terrorist, and NSA collects everything anyway. No need to even tell Jim anything.
In reality actual anons on here don't call for violence, so if anything goes according to actual law (it doesn't of course), none of the actual anons on here are guilty of anything.
>You are UNREASONABLE.
I said evil people use Jewish people as their own personal shield.
What's unreasonable about that?
What do you think the Satanists are doing?
>You love to use that word JEW so much
I actually don't.
I used it in 2 posts plus 1 reply to you, and both were related to the ASS-crew and their actions. I was even called one, various times, and I myself didn't take it as an insult, despite it obviously was supposed to be one, still it's factually wrong.
>to get me to hate Jews.
That makes no sense at all.
Why u IP hopping?
>stupid
Rather trusting experts, that are pretending to be experts, but are not (aka most medical doctors)
They don't deserve to get sterilized for trusting liars.