Anonymous ID: d1ec25 June 19, 2022, 8:11 p.m. No.16475168   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5181 >>5185

>>16475150

False.

Q hasn't posted for quite a while.

Q may or may not delete it when Q comes back.

That's all.

>but these Q drops

That's your interpretation. It's Q's board. I rather keep board fuckery on Q's board instead of fucking with it.

 

Why are you so obsessed with deletion, while at the same time going crazy about deletions in here? That does not make sense. Are you just in it for drama and to waste everyone's time?

Anonymous ID: d1ec25 June 19, 2022, 8:21 p.m. No.16475211   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5218 >>5220 >>5236

>>16475185

So you want to delete posts from Q's board, because you assume that Q wants it gone.

 

Why not simply wait for Q to return and decide him or herself or itself.

 

You want to fuck with Q's board to solve something you assume Q wants to be handled like you want it to.

It seems you think very highly of yourself. I don't.

 

Did you post it and want the evidence of that gone?

Anonymous ID: d1ec25 June 19, 2022, 8:25 p.m. No.16475228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5233 >>5266 >>5483

>>16475205

Ok.

First basics:

Define 'clean'.

Defne clean.

What's the difference between these two?

 

>to lock in trips

That surely worked, didn't it.

Does the B post use a trip? No.

Does it use "Q" as user? No.

Can't be confused with a Q drop and as such not a danger to anyone.

 

And I don't see the part where Q says to delete any foreign post from the 'clean' board in case someone posts in there.

Can you point me to that?

Anonymous ID: d1ec25 June 19, 2022, 8:30 p.m. No.16475247   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5279 >>5287

>>16475218

>'clean' private board

Why 'clean' and not clean?

What's the difference?

Details matter.

 

The point as given by Q was to lock in trips. That was not compromised at all.

On here you can allow further trips. On there you can't.

 

>do something before Q has to do something about it

Q's board, not mine, nor Jim's.

So you say: fuck with the board a second time, I know for sure Q wants it handled like that?

Anonymous ID: d1ec25 June 19, 2022, 8:53 p.m. No.16475370   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5390 >>5391 >>5401 >>5429

>>16475340

Now you write clean, instead of 'clean'.

Why change it?

New meaning?

Accident?

Mistake?

 

>a rouge global volunteer violating Q's private board by posting on it was surely a mistake

Define mistake

So you think the GV posted in there by accident or erroneously?

To me it looks as if that post was done intentionally. The GV wanted to post in there.

 

In any case, removing evidence of that is not acceptable either. Do you know that Q knows about the "B" post? Maybe Q doesn't. If someone deletes it, Q will still think his private board was kept in tippy top condition and the B post never happened.

Anonymous ID: d1ec25 June 19, 2022, 9:15 p.m. No.16475471   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5493 >>5514

>>16475435

>misguided

You can redefine any crime to fit that.

Fauci's lies about covid + masks were probably also misguided in a sense.

 

If these IP hashes can be trusted, it may have been a plain LARP, and thus intentionally. For personal gain.

 

I'm still not okay with deleting it. Q can delete it. That's it.

Anonymous ID: d1ec25 June 19, 2022, 9:21 p.m. No.16475499   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16475452

If that was the case, I would see even less reason to delete it. In that case it would have been criminally relevant, and would be a major problem for the one that did it.

And this could even be a very good reason wanting it to get deleted.

 

Fishing is fun?

Anonymous ID: d1ec25 June 19, 2022, 9:32 p.m. No.16475535   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5547 >>5568 >>5575

>>16475514

>The proper move by Jim back then was to remove the post

If this was really a way to get Q out of cover, then that post would be criminally relevant.

Deleting it would be tampering with evidence in regards of a military operation.

May even be Jim's stance.

Jim is (ex?)-military after all.