Anonymous ID: eca80c June 19, 2022, 9:03 p.m. No.16475429   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5451

>>16475370

KEK

Q, with the sniffers that have the ability to find anything on the internet not to mention it's his private board and not some faraway Mongolian basket weaving server, doesn't know about the B post.

Your non-stop pedantic argument style in this bread is tolerable, but being that disingenuous?

Yeah, not so much.

Anonymous ID: eca80c June 19, 2022, 9:10 p.m. No.16475452   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5499

>>16475415

Ah, but here's the rub.

Q mentioned before that there are laws about how he does things that must be followed.

It is very possible that under the Biden admin n Q no longer can legally post on his board any longer.

And the possibility that the B post was made in order to bring back Q to do just that is potentially even moar sinister.

Anonymous ID: eca80c June 19, 2022, 9:27 p.m. No.16475514   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5517 >>5535

>>16475471

Why even put Q in the spot for cleanup when he clearly stated to CM at the time that nobody except he and CM should be able to touch it?

The proper move by Jim back then was to remove the post and state publicly here that safeguards were put in place (as they should have remained all along) to never allow that to happen again.

That would have not only given him total cred for being a stand-up guy, it also would have potentially allayed any concerns by Q that this is CBTS 2.0.

Only this time it's at the site owner level and not the BO level like before.

And now the timeline is at the point where it's prolly too late and the image board format that many anons still here obviously prefer has been burnt as a possibility for any future Q drops.

Thankfully, Truth Social now exists to keep the potential new Q hope alive.

Anonymous ID: eca80c June 19, 2022, 9:53 p.m. No.16475613   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16475586

No new Q and Brandon, not PDJT, became the WH inhabitant on 1/21/2021 are prolly the 2 biggest factors.

That said, a bunch of oldfags flew back onto the board on 5/29/2021 when the QAlerts went off.

Only to head back out disgustedly in even bigger numbers when the F&G was confirmed.

A long slow fade since then.

Anonymous ID: eca80c June 19, 2022, 10:10 p.m. No.16475671   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16475617

>Claim was made: /hivemind? would take anons from /qresearch/โ€ฆ.Didn't happen

I recall way moar Deepdigs claims to that effect than hivemind ones.

>Claim was made: Truth Social would drain away anonsโ€ฆ.Didn't happen

Absolutely is happening.

The bread speed and overall post quality these days paint an entirely different picture.

And the digg production of Q related topics?

Yuge edge to Truth Social there.

Anonymous ID: eca80c June 19, 2022, 10:25 p.m. No.16475751   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5789

>>16475701

>rally breads do that a lot.

Rally breads are a tiny proportion of the overall breads since PDJT does maybe 2 a month tops these days.

And the last few (not even counting the speech only ones) have not been the usual 1-1.5 hour rally breads of the past.

Moar like 2.5.

Look, QR is slowing down across all metrics and the pretending it's not stuff is telling everyone that their eyes are lying.

Anonymous ID: eca80c June 19, 2022, 10:37 p.m. No.16475772   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16475752

I don't even need to see Jim's under the hood stats to know that peak lurker occurred when Q was actively dropping.

You know, when lurkers really had a great reason to lurk.

Now, not so much, tho I'm sure the number isn't 0.

Anonymous ID: eca80c June 19, 2022, 10:52 p.m. No.16475811   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5815

>>16475789

Because it's still a good place for commiserating with like-minded patriots during a world gone mad.

But, I've also diversified into going back to the battlefield where the real fight is needed most.

And, I believe recognizing the truth in it's good, bad, and ugly form is moar important than being a knowingly blind cheerleader when it comes to describing the reality of the situation as best I see it.