First thing, I would like to apologize to the Good and courageous Generals, whom defend their Country and Constitution. I am sorry. Was quite a bold statement from me.

We had a confirmation in latest Trump speech that he and his team monitoring these boards.

Video:

https://rumble.com/v18osbd-live-president-donald-j.-trump-in-nashville-tennessee.html

<Not the nicest confirmation ever made.

There was a post made before Trump speech, pic related.

There was no need for Trump to defend "Generals" at his speech, but he did.

>From 37:00 about 1min.

>>16476224

<Whatever happened with a guy who tried to assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

There was actually a confirmation during his speech that assassin was HIRED. But of course, Senators have to be "Politically correct" in their statements and keep everything "random", like we should believe, that guy comes out of nowhere and tries to assassinate Justice.

>They should try to send him to "Bloody" Gina, he will speak

>>16476270

Do you seriously think that would be killer could tell something like "Oh, the Chuck messaged me, that he will pay me 10k$ for the head of SC Justice"??

>Blaming meds is quite a common theme amongst them. They use it to tie the knots, like "oh look at me, I am depressed, seriously mentally ill and I can not be charged. Don't even try to interrogate me on who hired me to carry out the "hit".

So now what, CIA will search for his "therapist"?? Like they comes to a this therapist and?

"Sir, why did you prescribe him this medicine?"

This is a joke, the guy knew what and for whom he was carrying out the hit job. They always know.

>>16476314

Ok. According to this same Q, the shooters was "turned off" (week minds from meds) and was controlled to carry out the shootings.

Nevertheless, if this hit would be carried out from Gina's controlled CIA, it would be completed. But it wasn't. So I in this case wouldn't jump to the conclusion that this was done from CIA side.