https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1539244806920097792?s=20&t=Vjc7GFcHMYm3HtFz7WrOZw

Honestly how does he make things up like this. His endless lies are maddening. He obviously can't read a room, nor a nation. But where's all the press, you are not a psychologist President Bidan, you can't say that you know that?

He should consider him stealing the election makes people unhappy, not because we are incapable of being happy.

He also just destroyed our country and we should be pleased?

https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1497629895547105280?s=20&t=Vjc7GFcHMYm3HtFz7WrOZw

This is why the DC jury let Sussmann off, because everyone in DC lies and they think nothing of it, unless it's a trump supporter

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1538890647217774592?s=20&t=Vjc7GFcHMYm3HtFz7WrOZw

J6 Committee is making a big deal of the dueling electors, but it was well known and reported in 2020

Explainer:Dueling Electors and the Upcoming Joint Session of Congress

Posted Thursday, December 17, 2020

Presidential candidates in the United States win elections by winning the most electoral votes. The Electoral College system apportions a certain number of votes to each state. When voters in a state vote for a party’s candidate, they’re actually casting a vote for that party’s slate of electors, or people chosen to cast electoral votes. Those electoral votes are counted by Congress. If a candidate gets 270 or more, they win the presidency.

Dueling Electors

In seven states on Dec. 14, a slate of Democratic electors chose Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. Republican electors, even though Biden was certified as the winner in the states, also cast votes for President Donald Trump.

The phenomenon created seven sets of so-called dueling electors, or alternate slates. Both groups are sending certificates of ascertainment to Congress, which is slated to convene in a joint session on Jan. 6, 2021, to count electoral votes.

Dueling electors are highly unusual, but they have happened in U.S. history. The last time was in the 1960 election, when the governor of Hawaii certified electors for Republican Richard Nixon. Democratic electors cast their votes for Democrat John F. Kennedy. A subsequent recount determined Kennedy actually won the state, and he was declared the winner in the joint session in 1961.

John Eastman, professor of law at the Chapman University School of Law, pointed to the Kennedy-Nixon scenario when talking about the seven dueling electors this time around.

“We have historical precedent here, and in each of these states, there is pending litigation challenging the results of the election. If that litigation proved successful, then the Trump electors, having met and voted, would be able to have those votes certified and be the ones properly counted in the joint session of Congress on January 6,” he told NTD.

Gary Gregg II, director of the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville, told The Epoch Times that short of “actual evidence of fraud” that would move Congress to certify the alternate set of electors, the ones certified by the state’s governors—all for Biden, in this case—will be the ones counted.

The electoral votes have been “officially counted” and the votes have been sent on, he said. “There’s nothing to be done, until it gets to Congress,” he said.

“It’s obviously a very, very long shot,” added Robert Hardaway, professor at the Sturm College of Law at the University of Denver, because “all the challenges have not been successful by both Trump and his supporters.” “But that’s the reason for it,” he told The Epoch Times. “If later it’s determined the Republican slate should have been elected, they’ll have the vote already in place.”

In three of the seven states in question—Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—Republicans currently control the state legislatures while Democrats hold the governor’s mansions. In New Mexico and Nevada, Democrats control both. In Georgia and Arizona, Republicans control both.

Republicans have not been able to gain enough support to get the dueling electors certified by the top election official—usually the secretary of state—nor did the state legislatures exercise their constitutional right to take back the power to choose which candidate to give the electoral votes to.

Joint Session

After electors cast their votes this week, attention turned to the upcoming joint session, which takes place just three days after newly elected members of Congress are sworn in.

At least four people who will be in the House—Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) and Rep.-elects Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Barry Moore (R-Ala.), and Bob Good (R-Va.)—have committed to filing objections during the session. (This is why Nancy set up the insurrection in the capitol, so these people couldn’t challenge the vote)…

Clinton Democrats tried to do the same thing in 2016 against Trump

Challenges were made by Democrats in 2016 but failed because no senators supported them.

https://amac.us/explainer-dueling-electors-and-the-upcoming-joint-session-of-congress/

>>16484713

told ya they would just shuffle her off to another agency

MSM media polls are always wrong and slanted, FOX is almost the worst!

https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1539276343468335104?s=20&t=T2jOJi4CMTZlZ_h5r64X2g

Twitter board trying to cover some highly illegal things and still get the share price first offered.

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1539241185847517188?s=20&t=T2jOJi4CMTZlZ_h5r64X2g

something very off putting in this picture,they both look that just hatched some evil plan to dominate the world with midgets

EXCLUSIVE:Police Report Proves Plainclothes Electronic Surveillance Unit Members Were Embedded Among Jan. 6 Protesters

(This article is damning, posted by anon on prior board)

Embedded ESU members wore a specific 'bracelet on their left wrist identifying them as MPD personnel'

By Patricia Tolson June 20, 2022 Updated: June 21, 2022

While there is growing speculation that federal agents and Capitol Police were involved in instigating acts of violence during the Jan. 6, 2021 protests and recording responses for the purposes of entrapment, evidence now proves that “plainclothes” members of a special Electronic Surveillance Unit (ESU) were embedded among the protesters for the purposes of conducting video surveillance. Evidence also points to a day of security deficiencies and police provocation for the purpose of entrapment.

According to a report—First Amendment Demonstrations, issued Jan. 3, 2021, by Chief of Police Robert Contee of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), Homeland Security Bureau, Special Operations Division, obtained exclusively by The Epoch Times—the MPD began to activate Civil Disturbance Unit (CDU) platoons on Jan. 4, 2021. Full activation of 28 platoons was scheduled to occur on the following two days.

During his opening remarks before two Senate committees on March 3, 2021, Walker told members of Congress he received a “frantic call” from Sund in the early afternoon advising that the security perimeter of the Capitol was being breached. However,military leaders informed him that deploying troops would not be “good optics.” Milley

At the hearing, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene informed the committee three people were involved in turning down repeated requests for the deployment of the National Guard: “Chuck Schumer in the Senate, Nancy Pelosi in the House, and Mayor Muriel Bowser. Also involved, are the SSAA Stenger, who answers directly to Schumer, and HSAA Irving, who answers directly to Pelosi.”

The Proof

Unknown to the public until now, the First Amendment Demonstrations report alsoreveals that an undisclosed number of “plainclothes” MPD ESU “members” were embedded into the crowd to “document the actions of the demonstrators and MPD’sresponse to any civil disobedience or criminal activity.”

In 2016, the MPD purchased 2,800 body-worn cameras. It is unclear who the MPD ESU “members” were. However, they are never referred to as “officers” or “police.” Of the 37 “Specialized Units” listed as part of the MPD, an ESU is not among them. In order for other security personnel to recognize embedded ESU members among the protesters, they wore a specific “bracelet on their left wrist identifying them as MPD personnel,” the report stated.

Photo of bracelet worn by plainclothes members of the Metropolitan Police Department’s Electronic Surveillance Unit, embedded in the crowds(see pic) on Jan. 6, 2021 to “document the actions of the demonstrators and MPD’s response to any civil disobedience or criminal activity.” (Metropolitan Police Department First Amendment Demonstrations report.)

“While it is admittedly an important type of unit to have in the nation’s capital, electronic surveillance requires warrants,” Waller told The Epoch Times. “The word surveillance itself implies intrusive rather than passive monitoring of people, in which case it would be required for the police to get warrants to conduct electronic surveillance on people. What kind of warrants were asked for and under which jurisdiction? Were they issued? If not, why? Are such warrants necessary for the type of surveillance this unit was doing and how does it work? This raises a huge amount of questions about an entirely new kind of surveillance unit by the police chief of the nation’s capital.”

Waller also said the reference to “members” of the unit, as opposed to “officers” or “agents,” is also very disturbing. While he said “the rest of the memorandum sounds very disciplined in it’s language and specific,”that it doesn’t identify “officers” as members of the Electronic Surveillance Unit “is very troubling.”

“Are they using private contractors? Are they using political volunteers?” Waller posed. “Are using paid agents of different types? We don’t know. This is something the public has a right to know and we need to get to the bottom of it. If the D.C Police is running electronic surveillance on American citizens without warrants, this could be a very serious breach of our civil liberties.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-police-report-proves-plainclothes-electronic-surveillance-unit-members-were-embedded-among-jan-6-protesters_4527036.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2022-06-21&utm_medium=email&est=S5vBcMItRbd1iPS0kNwF58sAli%2BHXGDwflrhztBD6Psi94fYJmZJo2UV0WXmS8o%3D

>>16484868

kekkity

>>16484877

the creativity here is beyond imagination, perfecto anons

>>16484649

a very important reason to destroy the dollar, now

Poll: Republican Nominee Mark Ronchetti in Statistical Tie with New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham

Mark Ronchetti, the Republican nominee for governor in New Mexico, is in a statistical tie with Democrat Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, according to a new poll.

With 45 percent support of New Mexico voters, Lujan Grisham has a narrow lead over Ronchetti’s 42 percent. However, the race is a statistical tie because Lujan Grisham’s lead is within the poll’s 3.9 percent margin of error.

The poll also found that nine percent of voters support libertarian candidate Karen Bedonie. In addition, five percent of voters remain undecided ahead of November’s midterm election.

A different poll also commissioned by NM Political Report found that less than 50 percent of voters approve of the job Lujan Grisham is doing in New Mexico.

Ronchetti won New Mexico’s Republican gubernatorial primary earlier in the month by a landslide, receiving more than 60 percent of the vote. Ronchetti defeated a crowded field of Republican challengers that included state Rep. Rebecca Dow (R) and U.S. Air Force veteran Jay Block.

Ronchetti’s victory in the GOP primary comes off the heels of a loss in New Mexico’s 2020 race for U.S. Senate to Democrat Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM). Before getting involved in politics, Ronchetti worked as New Mexico’s CBS and Fox affiliate stations chief meteorologist.

The poll surveyed 642 New Mexico voters on June 13 and June 14.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/21/poll-republican-nominee-mark-ronchetti-in-statistical-tie-with-new-mexico-governor-michelle-lujan-grisham/

Report: ‘Record Number’ of LGBTQ Candidates Running for Congress this Year

God, I pray fervently, please stop this evil!

A “record number” of LGBTQ candidates are running for Congress, “motivated in part” by laws in GOP states shoring up parental rights and protecting women and girls’ sports, Axios Congressional reporter Sophia Cai reported Tuesday.

Approximately 104 LGBTQ candidates are running for House or Senate seats in the 2022 midterm elections — a nearly 20 percent increase compared to 2020, when 87 LGBTQ candidates campaigned, Cai wrote.

“Some of those campaigns have already ended, but as of last week, 57 candidates are still actively running, according to data,” the report reads.

Cai wrote that candidates at the state level “say discriminatory laws have motivated them to seek a seat in their legislatures.” These supposed “discriminatory laws,” however, are put forth by Republicans to keep radical gender ideology from infiltrating schools and creating a divide between parents and their children.

A prime example is Florida’s Parental Rights in Education Act, which expands parents’ oversight of their children’s education and prohibits the teaching of gender identity and sexual orientation from kindergarten through third grade. Democrats and corporate media allies quickly dubbed it the “Don’t Say Gay” bill and claim it targets vulnerable gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex children. In reality, the legislation does not mention any particular sexuality.

The Biden administration, Democrats, and pro-transgender clinical organizations have also been pushing sex change surgeries, puberty blockers, and cross-sex hormones — labeled “gender-affirming care” — for minors who believe they are a different sex. Additionally, Democrats have pushed to allow males identifying as females to play women and girls’ sports and share female spaces, despite well-documented biological advantages and overall safety concerns.

Democrats have gone so far as to promote letting children attend drag shows ( see here, here, here, here, and here). In response, Republicans in several states have already begun crafting laws to criminalize exposing children to drag shows. GOP lawmakers have also created and passed laws in many states criminalizing “gender- affirming care” for minors and banning males from female sports.

This is what a “family-friendly drag show” in a bar looks like pic.twitter.com/oTnLmdEkaZ

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 16, 2022

According to the Axios report, LGBTQ voters “are among the fastest-growing parts of the electorate” and have high election turnout, though there are only 11 “out” LGTBQ Congress members.

Indeed, recent Gallup polling suggests the number of people who self-identify” as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT), or “something other than heterosexual,” has increased to 7.1 percent of the 329 million population in the United States. A Pew Research Center Survey published in June found that five percent of Americans from 18 to 30-years-old identify as “transgender” or “nonbinary.”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/21/report-record-number-of-lgbtq-candidates-running-for-congress-this-year/

Legally Armed Woman Shoots Alleged Attacker Inside Grocery Store

A legally armed woman shot an alleged attacker inside a Hy-Vee grocery store Sunday morning in Des Moines, Iowa.

FOX 32 reports that the woman fired shots around 10 a.m., after allegedly being attacked by 30-year-old Kapri Lashawn Francis.

Francis was shot in the leg.

KCCI notes that police indicated Francis launched a “totally unprovoked attack” against the woman. Francis allegedly attacked the woman and put her in a headlock, prior to shots being fired.

Des Moines police department Sgt. Paul Parizek said, “Lawfully possessed and responsibly handled firearms can enhance public safety.”

Francis is charged with “assault causing bodily injury.” The legally armed woman faces no charges.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/21/legally-armed-woman-shoots-alleged-attacker-grocery-store/

>>16484939

that's funny, maybe he will be a better Gov.

Biden’s Push For Electric Vehicles Hits A Huge Roadblock —A New Anti-Slave Labor Law

(Hmmm and the DOE is involved in this law….)

A new law prevents supplies from China for electric vehicles and other green energy products from entering the U.S., halting a Biden administration priority, the New York Times reported.

The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act requires proof that any products coming from Xinjiang, one of the main sources of products crucial in making batteries, were free of forced labor, the NYT reported. The law goes into effect on Tuesday.

President Biden is pushing to make at least 50% of vehicles emission-free by 2030 as part of his push for green energy, The White House stated in a press release.

Xinjiang is reportedly expanding to different areas of China where Uyghurs reside, according to the NYT. The expansion has allowed Xinjiang to acquire new deposits as the company is involved in providing many companies with electric products.

The Biden administration has faced obstacles in its EV initiative, including cratering revenues among auto manufacturers. Ford saw a 5% decline in revenue and a $5.4 billion loss in the first quarter after investing in the production of electric vehicles. A number of states, including New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and Montana criticized Biden’s plan for electric vehicle charging stations. (RELATED: Are Electric Vehicles A Scam?)

“If you were to look at any electric vehicle battery, there would be some involvement from China,” Daisy Jennings-Gray, a senior analyst at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, told the NYT.

TheDepartment of Energy(the DOE hmm, where have I heard that name before) did not immediately respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

https://dailycaller.com/2022/06/21/bidens-electric-huge-roadblock-new-anti-slave-labor-laws/

>>16484984

is that a him?