>>16485417

>Uvalde

Texas top cop: Uvalde police could've ended rampage early on

Uvalde Mayor Don McLaughlin said Tuesday that the city has “specific legal reasons” that it's not answering questions publicly or releasing records.“There is no cover-up," he said in a statement.

Police haven’t found any red flags in Ramos' school disciplinary files but learned through interviews that he engaged in cruelty to animals. “He walked around with a bag of dead cats,” McCraw said.?

https://theeagle.com/ap/national/texas-top-cop-uvalde-police-couldve-ended-rampage-early-on/article_021fbbba-880b-577a-8fb7-6bcd3dba4d3d.html

heard blurb just now on news about todays meeting Arreeedondo has 3 chances to attend, today was the 2nd no-show after 3 they can charge him

The mayor has vowed to release a letter tomorrow to throw under the bus who ever needs to be under the bus live on scene quip

if anyone could whip up some quick sauce on that

>>16485485

and if we were told:

hey potato is gonna win

no matter how hard you fight or vote

the election is a guaranteed steal

AND

this will extend for a number of years

we would not have had the same ability to handle the past few years with as much KEK as possible or had much good to say

>>16485507

There is no coverup’: Uvalde mayor says city aims for transparency, but can’t comment on shooting investigation for legal reasons

An image surfaced online from the surveillance video inside Robb Elementary during the shooting, showing that officers were armed with ballistic shields, guns and other tools while in the hallway, ready to approach the gunman despite Arredondo’s orders to wait.

In addition to being the Uvalde CISD chief of police, Arredondo was sworn in as a city councilman in a private ceremony the week after the shooting.

He has not made an appearance at a Council meeting and has largely been in hiding since the shooting.

https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2022/06/21/there-is-no-coverup-uvalde-mayor-says-city-aims-for-transparency-but-cant-comment-on-shooting-investigation-for-legal-reasons/

>>16485637

>The first part made me everything I had, the second part cost me everything I had.

wouldn't change a thing either anon

slings and arrows are just ideas

>>16485659

harvey weinstein had a cock AND vagina with no balls so yea

must be a hell of a club

>>16485658

ty notetakeranon

>>16485706

GROOMER NOTABLE

IF YOUR PARENTS AREN'T ACCEPTING OF YOUR (rainbow) IDENTITY

I'M YOUR MOM NOW

>>16485690

Indeed

>>16485724

"knee high by the fourth of July"

that's how we was raised

>>16485782

kek

>>16485804

your employer will take out a million dollar life insurance policy on you without your knowledge

and keep all the money when you die never sharing with your family

army

disney

walmart

etc

etc

>>16485839

well the money laundering (drugs humans loot) has been interrupted so that'll help

>>16485880

https://www.policygenius.com/life-insurance/dead-peasant-insurance/

The nickname dead peasant insurance started in the 1980s, when several large companies — including Walmart, Procter & Gamble, Nestle, and Winn-Dixie — bought corporate-owned life insurance policies on thousands of regular employees. [1]

This was done for tax benefits, not to profit from the deaths of employees. But because companies did it without telling employees — and raked in millions through tax breaks and death benefits — critics started calling it dead peasant insurance.