AMAbutnotthatbecauseholyshitit'snotallowedtowrongthouhght
Wasn't me, dingus. I do expect people to lie though, censors fuckery has been a constant. Words no longer means shit around here.
Wouldja lookit dat, jes look at it
>is anon personally DNC
>does not care that your questions are
It's reasonable to expect an AMA particpiant point at a question being ignored. You're kinda clueless, but he DID ask for questions and he only ignores it at risk of whatever it is says about him. You may not care, but it's an AMA dude, and AMA (but not that) is how AMAs have blown up in faces before.
Jim, how well do you know Thomas Schoenberger? How well do you know the company ShadowBox a rent cyber attack back larping company harrassing and pulling off psyops?
or Silent Partner, a subverted company inside that company?
When you interviewed did you not know?
Or do you still not know?
If you know now will you disavow Thomas?
Questions for you Jim here >>16486183
Admin started it
It's an AMA, which means "ask me anything". Literally Admin started it. kek.
Are you aware of a warrant canary question's existence?
Do you want to know more about Shadow Box?
https://burners.me/2019/10/24/larp-wars-part-3-shadowbox/
This is the FIRST TIME I have heard /hm/ is BANNED ALL TOGETHER. Are you fucking serious?
Show me the post banning all /hm/ participants getting banned from /qr/ ANYWHERE. You've certainly got that at hand right? You can't say banned is banned without an actual ban moment. Because that means unbanned, and unbanned is unbanned.
Ok thank you for that answer. I can rule off that possibility from my list then.
Am aware of a policy for meta ALONE.
4mind????
Was moderator intervention always allowed contrary to Q's specifications given to Ron? Or did it change at a certain point? When if so?
>lookit me I work in a datacenter
>surely I don't spin up VM's
>but the lack oof evidence in one VM/RM is surely convincing!~
Blow it out of your ass, weirdo. Absence of bookmarks in a singular instance means nothing to someone who supposedly worked in a datacenter. Use logic, dude. You're lying attempting a narrative.
When the board for /projectDcomms/ was set up, it was done so with constraints Q specified here in the picrel qpost. I'm asking you of your knowledge of whether it was ALWAYS a lie and that mods could access, or if it was SOMETIMES a lie.
Isn't that interesting?
The decision doesn't reflect when the policy was put into place. If you are unaware of when that policy was made, then say so. That's what it sounds like you are saying here.
Secret courts exist.
Thanks for answering some, legitimately.