dChan
Anonymous ID: d9eeb7 June 22, 2022, 11:19 a.m. No.16489506   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Charge: Clinton and DNC break pledge to stop lying about Trump dossier

by Paul Bedard, Washington Secrets Columnist | | June 16, 2022 02:00 PM

 

In a new bid to hide their attorney’s efforts regarding the disputed Trump-Russia dossier, the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party have already violated a two-month-old promise to stop lying about their efforts, according to charges filed with the Federal Election Commission.

 

The complaint shared with Secrets focuses on the move by the DNC and Hillary for America to claim attorney-client privilege in shielding work done by their law firm Perkins Coie and former partner Michael Sussmann from special counsel John Durham.

 

That appeared to violate a pledge made to the FEC to stop claiming attorney-client privilege regarding the over $1 million they paid the law firm for work done by Fusion GPS on the so-called “Steele Dossier” and to accept the election agency’s finding that the work was for opposition research, not “legal advice and services.”

 

In giving that pledge to the FEC, the Clinton campaign and DNC paid a combined $113,000 fine to make the case go away.

 

But in renewing the claim that their relationship with Perkins Coie is protected by an attorney-client relationship, the campaign and party committee face having the FEC reopen its investigation and level even greater fines.

 

The new complaint filed with the FEC is the latest by the Coolidge Reagan Foundation to force the 2016 Clinton campaign and DNC to tell the truth about their role in and spending on the dossier, a crude document meant to smear then-candidate Donald Trump as he was rising in the polls in advance of the presidential election he won.

 

In the FEC deal revealed by Secrets two months ago, the agency said it found probable cause that the Clinton campaign and the DNC misreported the expenses for the Fusion GPS services to Perkins Coie.

 

The campaign and party said they wouldn’t dispute or further fight the case, at least with the FEC. “Solely for the purpose of settling this matter expeditiously and to avoid further legal costs, respondent[s] does not concede, but will not further contest the commission's finding of probable cause to proceed” with the probe, they said in the FEC deal.

Dan Backer, with the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, said that in making the new claim in the case brought by Durham, the campaign and party were contesting the commission's findings — exactly what they promised never to do.

 

“The FEC found probable cause to believe HFA and the DNC violated federal law by filing false campaign finance disclosure reports with the commission,” he said in sizing up the original case for the new complaint. He added, “Specifically, HFA and the DNC falsely claimed payments made to Perkins Coie in connection with Fusion GPS’s opposition research and investigations into Trump to prepare the salacious and fraudulent Steele Dossier were for the purpose of legal services. In reality, Fusion GPS’s investigation into Trump and preparation of the Steele Dossier were for political purposes and not for the purpose of enabling Perkins Coie to provide legal advice or in connection with litigation.”

 

But in making the case that the Perkins Coie spending was for legal services and should be protected from release to Durham, Backer wrote, “HFA’s and the DNC’s intervention, arguments, and supporting declarations in United States v. Sussmann violate their agreement to ‘not further contest the commission’s finding of probable cause to believe’ Fusion GPS’s opposition research into Trump and preparation of the Steele Dossier did not constitute legal services.”

 

In an earlier letter sent to Durham, Backer said, “The government should not permit HFA and the DNC to adopt conflicting positions in different proceedings, depending on the federal agency against which they are litigating.”

 

Backer just sent his new complaint to the FEC, and it was unlikely that the agency, DNC, or Clinton campaign would have an immediate reaction.

Like the FEC, Durham has been eager to determine if the campaign or party was hiding documents under improper claims of attorney-client privilege.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/charge-clinton-dnc-break-pledge-to-stop-lying-about-trump-dossier

Anonymous ID: d9eeb7 June 22, 2022, 12:04 p.m. No.16489727   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9794

Trump slams McCarthy over lack of GOP involvement on Jan. 6 committee

By Callie Patteson June 22, 2022

 

Former President Donald Trump has blasted a “very foolish” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) over the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot — saying the lack of Republican participation was a “bad decision.”

 

The 45th president told conservative radio host Wayne Allyn Root on Sunday that McCarthy’s decision to shun the committee was not the right call.

 

“Unfortunately, a bad decision was made. This committee — it was a bad decision not to have representation on this committee. That was a very, very foolish decision,” Trump said, accusing the panel of conducting a “one-sided witch hunt.”

 

While there are two Republican members of Congress on the panel — Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois — Trump has continuously accused them of being “RINOs,” or Republicans in name only, for failing to back his false claims of massive voter fraud.

 

“We have no representation on this panel,” Trump said earlier in the interview. “We should certainly have some Republicans, real Republicans … We have nobody on that panel who can fight back.”

 

“In a way, the Republicans should be ashamed of themselves.”

 

A representative for McCarthy did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.

 

The former president has not shied away from expressing his frustration privately, recently saying, “I don’t know why Kevin didn’t put anyone on the committee,” according to CNN, which cited a GOP source with direct knowledge of the comments.

 

Trump doubled down on his remarks Wednesday, telling Punchbowl News it “would have been good” if there were increased Republican representation on the committee.

see also

Pence says Americans ‘understand’ he carried out his duty on Jan. 6

 

“Well, I think in retrospect, I think it would have been very smart to put [Republicans on the committee] and again, I wasn’t involved in it from a standpoint so I never looked at it too closely. But I think it would have been good if we had representation.” Trump said.

 

“I think in retrospect [McCarthy should’ve put Republicans on] to just have a voice. The Republicans don’t have a voice. They don’t even have anything to say,” he continued.

 

Trump suggested that Republican Reps. Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio would have been good additions to the panel.

 

“But when [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi wrongfully didn’t allow them, we should’ve picked other people,” Trump said. “We have a lot of good people in the Republican Party.”

 

In July 2021, Pelosi (D-Calif.) rejected McCarthy’s Republican nominations to the Jan. 6 committee, citing concerns about statements Banks and Jordan had made in the past.

 

“With respect for the integrity of the investigation, with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members, I must reject the recommendations of Representatives Banks and Jordan to the Select Committee,” she said at the time.

 

https://nypost.com/2022/06/22/trump-slams-mccarthy-over-lack-of-gop-involvement-on-jan-6-committee/