>>1649140

why is there two active threads on this?

the other one.

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1637375.html

ill just post this in both i guess

today VOP sent a drone over the original crime scene they discovered,. they cannot get any closer to it to film because Cemex has finally confessed to owning the property which allowed Cemex to tresspass VOP from the property, the police are keeping a close eye for tresspassers (protecting Cemex)

Today when VOP went next to the property to fly a drone the police showed up immediately and kept watch, surely waiting to arrest them if they took one step off public land onto Cemex property. which is why they sent a drone.

video of them sending the drone,

https://www.facebook.com/1415347948612114/videos/1423180187828890

video of the drones footage.

https://www.facebook.com/1415347948612114/videos/1423252627821646/

you can clearly see the site has indeed been bulldozed

many shills were posting relentlessly both here in the chans and in the youtube comments and in discords that "its a lie it wasnt bulldozed its all a hoax"

this proves that was a shill effort to discredit this situation.

this proves the shills do not want us looking into this…

>>1656266

thank you thats a much better screenshot comparison.

im thinking it was cemex that did the bulldozing though not the pd since it is cemex property,

if its the pd thats even more alarming, as its totally out of the way of their call of duty to bother bulldozing suspected crime scenes.

Cemex has to go out of their way to do it as well since it is a cost not worth spending to be bulldozing one random camp…

there is no reasonable argument in favor of bulldozing this crime scene. only cover up explains this move.

>>1656298

this is nothing more then a character attack, an ad hominum attack, you are trying to shoot the messenger to discredit the message.

that this man has accrued a rap sheet in his fight against a corrupt government as an activist, is not surprising, it is meaningless in this situation, that you would try and use it against him, and against the effort to expose the truth in this event, is telling.

>>1657020

>Warden used to have a site (now gone) called WardenburnsMexcianflags(dot)something.

https://web.archive.org/web/20120827042950/http://www.wardenburnsmexicanflags.com/

theres his site, browse away, at first glance it seems like just a bunch of opinions on politics, general bloviating about his anti illegals stance, and a bunch of documentation of his own legal battles for activism related things.