>Cult family
projection
The whole nwo logic is self refuting, it can only 'persist' like a cancer when it can ensnare 'trusting' minds to ingest the inconsistent logic of self divided from self.
This one made me kek
>These are great
Indeed the logic is bountiful in its analytical prowess.
Credit goes to DJTJr for posting the He Man meme that nails the false dialectic logic of the owo (old world order).
They're not a 'new' world order, their logic is pre enlightenment and predatory at its core.
The old guard logic of 'Ubermenschen, Menschen, Untermenschen' is pure parasitism of trusting consciousnesses.
Anon feels like the sentence in that last meme 'wiggled' a little, back and forth between the information declared and the body source doing the declaring.
It doesn't matter who says it, if a person divides themselves from the rest of humanity based on a system of knowing deception (darkness, old guard political power game theory), dividing humanity PRE engagement, which is to declare the one source is inherently divided/conflicted, a 'notion' of division at source, made into narrative object for the sole purpose of weakening the moral courage of whichever consciousness trusts to be an 'organic' logic of humanity and of themselves and overlook the knowing intent to harm the trusting recipient.
The entire NWO logic tree can be unpacked by UN-inverting all of their dialectic inversions of accusing others of what they themselves are doing in that very accusation.
Trusting yourself also means to trust that the shit they claim to see in you, is exclusively in their own blackened hearts.
To acknowledge the statement you made as correct as written, is not a logic of having identified an inconsistent statement as a 'lie'.
You can't read minds.
What if Anon made error?
Why smear as lie?
You sound threatened, which means you admit your statements are being challenged enough that to ensure 'everyone doesn't misunderstand', you need to write a smear of reading someone else's mind and declaring to know they are INTENDING to write an inconsistent statement to 'deceive' anons.
You're introducing flawed info.
If Anon used your logic, you would have to be declared yourself a liar.
But as all determinists do, there is always an escape hatch.
NWO can go fuck itself.
Does the 'thought' of Satan exist?
Anon has two recent learning habbenings.
-
Anon needs to be careful when saying 'but', as we can say 'but' when it really should be 'and'.
-
A thesis is not proved true by merely negating a finite set of other statements, unless the statements are mutually exclusive, but nwo logic likes to pretend mutually compatible statements are incompatible because there must be division not harmony at source.
Yes they also dialectically invert the word "God", inconsistencies galore.