There’s got to be personality tests or AI that can identify pedos before they are hired by schools. I worked with schools on benefits, the counties only require a background check state & locally.
https://twitter.com/emeriticus/status/1539969570902900737?s=20&t=7vsZEgJCkZwzjAoSSnyULw
Max Boots loves war
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1539774263913316357?s=20&t=7vsZEgJCkZwzjAoSSnyULw
Swallowell is an endless victim of harassment just because he had sex and a relationship with a Chinese Spy. He’s going for the best impression of Jussie Smollet
Guaranteed this guy gets no harassment because no one cares about him. He had to seriously spoiled as a child.
https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1539963177101758471?s=20&t=7vsZEgJCkZwzjAoSSnyULw
https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1539963177101758471?s=20&t=7vsZEgJCkZwzjAoSSnyULw
Parents Home School your children now. They will never stop, NEVER!
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1539824104131289089?s=20&t=7vsZEgJCkZwzjAoSSnyULw
Yes, Biden Is Hiding His Plan To Rig The 2022 Midterm Elections
BY: MOLLIE HEMINGWAY
JUNE 23, 2022
President Biden really does not want the public to know about his federal takeover of election administration. Dozens of members of Congress have repeatedly asked for details, to no avail. Good government groups, members of the media, and private citizens have filed requests under the Freedom of Information Act. Not a single one has been responded to. All signs indicate a concerted effort to keep the public in the dark until at least after the November midterm elections. The lack of transparency and responsiveness is so bad that the Department of Justice and some of its agencies have been repeatedly sued for the information.
When President Biden ordered all 600 federal agencies to “expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process” on March 7, 2021, Republican politicians, Constitutional scholars, and election integrity specialists began to worry exactly what was up his sleeve.
They had good reason. The 2020 election had suffered from widespread and coordinated efforts by Democrat activists and donors to run “Get Out The Vote” operations from inside state and local government election offices, predominantly in the Democrat-leaning areas of swing states. Independent researchers have shown the effect of this takeover of government election offices was extremely partisan and favored Democrats overwhelmingly.
At the time the order was issued, Democrats were also hoping to pass H.R. 1, a continuation of the effort to destabilize elections throughout the country via a federalized takeover of state election administrations.
Biden gave each agency 200 days to file their plans for approval by none other than Susan Rice, his hyperpartisan domestic policy advisor. Yet fully nine months after those plans were due, they are all being hidden from the public, even as evidence is emerging that the election operation is in full swing.
Mobilizing Voters Is Always A Political Act
There are several major problems with Biden’s secret plan, critics say. It’s unethical to tie federal benefits to election activity. It’s unconstitutional to have the federal government take authority that belongs to the states and which Congress has not granted. And, given that all 50 states have different laws and processes governing election administration, it’s a recipe for chaos, confusion, and fraud at a time when election security concerns are particularly fraught.
Mobilizing voters is always a political act. Choosing which groups to target for Get Out The Vote efforts is one of the most important activities done by political campaigns. Federal agencies that interact with the public by doling out benefits can easily pressure recipients to vote for particular candidates and positions. Congress passed the Hatch Act in 1939, which bans bureaucrats and bureaucracies from being involved in election activities after Democrats used Works Progress Administration programs and personnel for partisan political advantage.
Executive Order 14019 ignores that the Constitution does not give the executive branch authority over elections. That power is reserved for the states, with a smaller role for Congress. With H.R. 1 and other Democrat Party efforts to grab more control over elections have thus far failed, Congress hasn’t authorized such an expansion.
As with previous efforts to destabilize elections, the chaos and confusion that would occur are part of the plan. The Executive Order copied much of a white paper put out by left-wing dark money group Demos, which advocates for left-wing changes to the country and which brags on its website that it moves “bold progressive ideas from cutting-edge concept to practical reality.” Not coincidentally, Biden put former Demos President K. Sabeel Rahman and former Demos Legal Strategies Director Chiraag Bains in key White House posts to oversee election-related initiatives.
Rahman serves as senior counsel at the White House office that oversees regulatory changes, meaning he approves every federal agency’s regulations and provides legal review of executive orders before they’re released. If you were looking to rush out constitutionally and ethically questionable orders, this post would be key to fill. Bains had been Demos’ director of legal strategies, helping write the paper that was turned into an executive order. He reports directly to Susan Rice, the hyperpartisan head of the Domestic Policy Council….
https://thefederalist.com/2022/06/23/yes-biden-is-hiding-his-plan-to-rig-the-2022-midterm-elections/
=•The corruption in government at all levels was always there==, but they all don’t care if you know now, because you can’t do anything about it!
https://twitter.com/theblaze/status/1539692337202229249?s=20&t=7vsZEgJCkZwzjAoSSnyULw
https://twitter.com/theblaze/status/1539692337202229249?s=20&t=7vsZEgJCkZwzjAoSSnyULw
This site has date, place and time of birth for a lot os SC justices
https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Thomas,_Clarence
He reminds ne of the “Deep Thoughts” character on SNL. Pompeo says nothing and considers it wisdom
I’m waiting for the day they all get busted. They are pushing for civil war but they are getting a Revolution where the whole country wakes up.
Whats perplexing to me is that no lower court was capable of making the correct decision. It happens so much its almost worthless to have courts now. Courts are where victims become victimized again
This vampire should be executed for her crimes against humanity. She does endless studies on HiV AIDS in Africa on the publics money. Fauci created a cashcow with his AIDS bs
“Shall” in legal speak means its a mandate
Shall’ has the following meanings:
An imperative command; has a duty to or is required to. For example, the notice shall be sent within 30 days. Usually ‘shall’ used here is in the mandatory sense.
Should . Courts often interpret shall as should. For example, all claimants shall request mediation.
May. When a negative word such as not or no precedes shall the word shall often means may. For example, no person shall enter the building without first signing the roster.
Will . For example, the defendant shall then have a period of 30 days to object.
The following are some case law interpreting the word shall:
When used in statutes, contracts, or the like, the word "shall" is generally imperative or mandatory.[Independent School Dist. v. Independent School Dist., 170 N.W.2d 433, 440 (Minn. 1969)]
"In common, or ordinary parlance, and in its ordinary signification, the term 'shall' is a word of command, and one which has always, or which must be given a compulsory meaning; as denoting obligation. It has a peremptory meaning, and it is generally imperative or mandatory. It has the invariable significance of excluding the idea of discretion, and has the significance of operating to impose a duty which may be enforced, particularly if public policy is in favor of this meaning, or when addressed to public officials, or where a public interest is involved, or where the public or persons have rights which ought to be exercised or enforced, unless a contrary intent appears; but the context ought to be very strongly persuasive before it is softened into a mere permission," etc.[People v. O'Rourke, 124 Cal. App. 752, 759 (Cal. App. 1932)]
https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/shall/
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1539996418932441090?s=20&t=7vsZEgJCkZwzjAoSSnyULw