allPB
so you are saying that Geraldo is anon
a fucking faggot
a tremendous faggot
for lighting really big fires
like all of us faggots
all pb
More than likely
Traitors List
6:30 PM · Jun 23, 2022
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1540145211149406208
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
35m
Gun grabber
@JohnCornyn
voted for AG Merrick Garland.
Garland sent his Stasi agents to terrorize parents who protested pedophiles. He’s now sending his goons to raid random conservatives.
Cornyn wants to be the next Senate Majority Leader.
He literally hates you.
Pinned Tweet
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1540143278594486272
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
44m
DOJ does not issue statements like these disagreeing with Supreme Court rulings. It doesn’t happen. It has no lawful basis.
This can only be seen as a direct threat against the judiciary by Stasi agents
6:22 PM · Jun 23, 2022·Twitter for iPhone
969
Retweets
102
Quote Tweets
2,767
Likes
Cernovich Retweeted
https://twitter.com/YossiGestetner/status/1540147652653977603
Yossi Gestetner
@YossiGestetner
·
27m
If these ruthless thugs and barbaric goons really care about gun violence they were unleash hell on gun smugglers and dealers the way that they just treated a former DOJ official and other "election deniers."
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1540146158357454848
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
34m
Never trust a former federal prosecutor. They are social climbers at best. At worst they are psychopaths playing out their power fantasies on innocent people.
Quote Tweet
DeuceOfClubs
@deuce_clubs
· 40m
Replying to @Cernovich
This can't be happening. I have @AndrewCMcCarthy's word that Garland is a reasonable moderate just like Comey and Mueller.
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1540139702543454208
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
1h
This is unprecedented.
Quote Tweet
ABC News Politics
@ABCPolitics
· 8h
BREAKING: DOJ releases statement that they "respectfully disagree" with Supreme Court's ruling on New York gun law: "The Department of Justice remains committed to saving innocent lives by enforcing and defending federal firearms laws."
https://abcn.ws/3tZ90dH
https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/1540019978317053953
>Garland sent his Stasi agents to terrorize parents who protested pedophiles. He’s now sending his goons to raid random conservatives.
REPUBLCAN !!!! Cornyn wants to be the next Senate Majority Leader.
He literally hates you.
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
1h
This is unprecedented.
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1540142095217766405
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
57m
Looking forward to norm respecting lawyers to immediately express their shock and outrage at what is a truly unprecedented attack on the independent judiciary by the Department of Justice.
Quote Tweet
Justice Department
@TheJusticeDept
· 9h
Justice Department Statement on Supreme Court Ruling on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen
https://justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-statement-supreme-court-ruling-new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-inc
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1540142095217766405
Nick Uva
@nickuva
·
57m
Replying to
@Cernovich
Feels insurrectiony.
Daly Sunshine
@Daly_Sunshine
·
56m
Replying to
@Cernovich
They won’t enforce gun laws for inner city gang violence- the vast majority of gun violence
Zachdavis5555
@zachdavis55555
·
52m
Replying to
@Cernovich
Breaking: the Administrative State does not like checks on their power.
Alexander Brosda
@TheNinjaGeneral
·
51m
Replying to
@Cernovich
So what are they essentially saying? The decision by the highest Court in the country is bogus and we do what we want⁉️ We are in a big mess! We are no longer a country that wants to lead & strive and be a roll model for other countries attempting the democracy model.
Soylent Green for breakfast
@jeffrey_storch
·
42m
Replying to
@Cernovich
I know there is supposed to be tension between the three branches but this statement reads more like belligerence.
Mr Bear
@MrBear25517776
·
55m
Replying to
@Cernovich
Maybe Blacks will think twice before attacking random people in the streets and subways now. I hope Asians arm and protect themselves.
Dr Pat Riarchy
@younaziyou
·
55m
Replying to
@Cernovich
Biden must speak on this statement and fire anyone responsible for it being issued. If not this is definitely the first article of impeachment for the new Congress. Ignoring the Supreme Court is a high crime.
Cernovich Retweeted
https://twitter.com/GunOwners/status/154011620723548569
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1540038873094430721
Gun Owners of America
@GunOwners
·
2h
This would be laughable if not for how serious it is that your vote will threaten people's 2A rights as well, just in a different way.
From the ruling today: the Second Amendment "is not a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules…"
Take note, sir.
Quote Tweet
Lindsey Graham
@LindseyGrahamSC
· 7h
Great day for the Second Amendment. At its core, the Supreme Court ruled that the right to bear arms is the right to defend oneself and one’s property.
The New York law was a tremendous overreach putting unconstitutional requirements on concealed carry permits.
Show this thread
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1540038874688258052
Lindsey Graham
@LindseyGrahamSC
·
7h
Replying to
@LindseyGrahamSC
The Supreme Court's decision is yet another example of reinforcing the concept that the Second Amendment is an individual right rooted in the ability to defend oneself and property.
A big day for responsible gun ownership.
The Supreme Court ruled in its first major gun case in more than a decade
gonna get fun in NYC SOON
less victims
as they will carry SOON
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-gun-decision-shoots-down-ny-rule-high-bar-concealed-carry-licenses
SCOTUS did it right
DOJ is rebelling against SCOTUS ruling unprecedented
-—-
>Great day for the Second Amendment. At its core, the Supreme Court ruled that the right to bear arms is the right to defend oneself and one’s property.
The New York law was a tremendous overreach putting unconstitutional requirements on concealed carry permits.
The Supreme Court's decision is yet another example of reinforcing the concept that the Second Amendment is an individual right rooted in the ability to defend oneself and property.
A big day for responsible gun ownership.
Mr Bear
@MrBear25517776
·
55m
Replying to
@Cernovich
Maybe Blacks will think twice before attacking random people in the streets and subways now. I hope Asians arm and protect themselves.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-gun-decision-shoots-down-ny-rule-high-bar-concealed-carry-licenses
The Supreme Court Thursday ruled 6-3 that New York’s regulations that made it difficult to obtain a license to carry a concealed handgun were unconstitutionally restrictive, and that it should be easier to obtain such a license.
The existing standard required an applicant to show "proper cause" for seeking a license, and allowed New York officials to exercise discretion in determining whether a person has shown a good enough reason for needing to carry a firearm. Stating that one wished to protect themselves or their property was not enough.
"In this case, petitioners and respondents agree that ordinary, law-abiding citizens have a similar right to carry handguns publicly for their self-defense. We too agree, and now hold, consistent with Heller and McDonald, that the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the Court's opinion, referencing two previous gun cases. "Because the State of New York issues public-carry licenses only when an applicant demonstrates a special need for self-defense, we conclude that the State’s licensing regime violates the Constitution."
Thomas noted that the state statute does not define what "proper cause" means, and that courts had ruled that the standard was met by people who showed a "special need for self-protection."
SUPREME COURT SIGNALS IT COULD STRIKE DOWN OR LIMIT RESTRICTIVE NY GUN PERMIT LAW
"This ‘special need’ standard is demanding," Thomas wrote. "For example, living or working in an area ‘noted for criminal activity’ does not suffice."
In 43 other states, Thomas noted, authorities are required to issue licenses to applicants who meet certain requirements, and officials do not have discretion to say no due to what they believe is an insufficient need.
In a concurring opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted that Thursday's ruling does not prohibit states from setting requirements to obtain a carry license, and that it "addresses only the unusual discretionary licensing regimes[.]"
The case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, was the first major gun rights case before the Supreme Court in more than a decade. In the majority opinion, Thomas referenced 2010's McDonald v. City of Chicago and 2008's D.C. v. Heller in his reasoning for Thursday's ruling
"As we stated in Heller and repeated in McDonald, ‘individual self-defense is ‘the central component’ of the Second Amendment right,’" the justice cited. He also referenced how Heller made clear that restrictions on carrying guns in "sensitive places" is permissible, and how New York was wrong for arguing that it's law was merely doing just that.
"[W]e do think respondents err in their attempt to characterize New York’s proper-cause requirement as a ‘sensitive-place’ law," Thomas wrote, explaining that New York viewed "sensitive places" as anywhere "where people typically congregate and where law-enforcement and other public-safety professionals are presumptively available."
cont:
cont: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-gun-decision-shoots-down-ny-rule-high-bar-concealed-carry-licenses
This definition, Thomas said, is too broad.
"Put simply, there is no historical basis for New York to effectively declare the island of Manhattan a "sensitive place" simply because it is crowded and protected generally by the New York City Police Department," he wrote.
The conservative justice also looked at the plain language of the Second Amendment, which protects the right "to keep and bear arms." He described keeping and bearing as two separate things, noting that Heller defines "bear" as "to wear, bear, or carry." This implies public carrying, Thomas said, because someone would not generally wear their gun in a holster at home, but would "keep" it somewhere.
The 63-page opinion also explored historical restrictions on carrying handguns that New York relied on. Thomas explained why they do not justify a current restriction, noting how past regulations from centuries ago focused on "dangerous and unusual weapons," while handguns today are relatively commonplace. While the handgun may have been considering dangerous and unusual during colonial times, the opinion said, in modern times it is "the quintessential self-defense weapon."
The Court's opinion also stated that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms should not be held to a lower standard than other constitutional rights.
"We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need. That is not how the First Amendment works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion. It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense," Thomas wrote.
Justice Stephen Breyer wrote an impassioned dissenting opinion in which he referenced present-day fervor over gun violence, as well as recent events. Joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, Breyer cited statistics including 45,222 Americans killed by firearms in the U.S. in 2020, the number of mass shootings that have already taken place in 2022, and how gun violence is now the leading cause of death for children and adolescents.
"Many States have tried to address some of the dangers of gun violence just described by passing laws that limit, in various ways, who may purchase, carry, or use firearms of different kinds," Breyer wrote. "The Court today severely burdens States’ efforts to do so."
Justice Samuel Alito, in a concurring opinion, took issue with Breyer's references to recent shootings.
"Does the dissent think that laws like New York’s prevent or deter such atrocities? Will a person bent on carrying out a mass shooting be stopped if he knows that it is illegal to carry a handgun outside the home?" Alito asked. "And how does the dissent account for the fact that one of the mass shootings near the top of its list took place in Buffalo? The New York law at issue in this case obviously did not stop that perpetrator."
Breyer recognized legitimate purposes for guns, such as sport, self-defense, or types of employment like security guards, but he said it is the responsibility of elected officials to balance "these lawful uses against the dangers of firearms" when crafting legislation.
"That consideration counsels modesty and restraint on the part of judges when they interpret and apply the Second Amendment," he said.
needs trump hair
PASS THIS ON
NO one should go see the new Elvis movie tomorrow
it is a Tom Hanks movie and he is in in
all of the commercials down play this fact
that it stars Tom Hanks
if you pay to see this Elvis movie
ever
you are putting money into Tom and Rita Hanks pockets
and we all have our pedo concerns (Allegedly)
spread this on every bread
make Tom Hanks Movie ELVIS FLOP
I think they made this movie now
to go after normies and boomers
who may not have any idea what we know
to grab their money while he still can (Tom Hanks)
Lisa Marie and Priscilla Presley and ABC 20/20 did an entire hour PR push last night
trying to get all the boomers to go spend thier money tomorrow
Lisa Marie looks like a drug user and seems off
and there were rumors she made about pedo stuff regarding her most recent now divorced husband
and she married Michaeal Jackson???
Priscilla was a child bride to Elvis
do not forget this
and then he died at age 42
he is in the movie in full makeup fat suit and nose playing Col Tom Parker Elvis manager
TOM HANKS
>he is in the movie in full makeup fat suit and nose playing Col Tom Parker Elvis manager
he is in the movie in full makeup fat suit and nose
playing Col Tom Parker Elvis manager
it is a Tom Hanks movie and he is in in
all of the commercials down play this fact
that it stars Tom Hanks
they made this movie now
to go after normies and boomers
who may not have any idea what we know
to grab their money while he still can (Tom Hanks)
this psot sounds super glohard