Anonymous ID: b943a3 June 24, 2022, 4:24 a.m. No.16499177   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9198 >>9317 >>9423 >>9460 >>9692 >>9878 >>9919

@BernieSpofforth

 

BREAKING - The EU have now agreed to extend the Covid Passport / Green Pass for another 12 months.

 

It was never designed to set you free, it was designed to control you, your movements, how you live, work, think and speak.

 

https://twitter.com/BernieSpofforth/status/1539923892998914049

Anonymous ID: b943a3 June 24, 2022, 4:27 a.m. No.16499186   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9246 >>9423 >>9692 >>9878 >>9919

https://gettr.com/post/p1fg40226a4

 

@RepMTG

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

 

As we prayerfully await the decisions of the Supreme Court tomorrow, I introduced legislation to declare pro-abortion organizations, who have fire bombed women’s pregnancy centers, as terrorist organizations.

Anonymous ID: b943a3 June 24, 2022, 6:09 a.m. No.16499613   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9618 >>9637 >>9657 >>9661 >>9673 >>9692 >>9878 >>9919

Nancy Pelosi

@SpeakerPelosi

This morning, the Rules Committee is meeting to advance this life-saving legislation to the Floor. When the Committee finishes its business, we will head immediately to the Floor. And we will send the bill to @POTUS

for his signature, with gratitude for his leadership.

7:58 AM · Jun 24, 2022·Twitter for iPhone

 

https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/154031846483285606

Anonymous ID: b943a3 June 24, 2022, 6:57 a.m. No.16499870   🗄️.is 🔗kun

outside SCOTUS

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/3535684-watch-live-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-review-opinion-anticipated/

Anonymous ID: b943a3 June 24, 2022, 7:05 a.m. No.16499937   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9946

a few seconds ago

We have the first case, and it is Becerra.

 

a few seconds ago

It is by Justice Kagan, and the vote is 5-4.

 

a few seconds ago

Interesting lineup: Thomas, Breyer, Sotomayor and Barrett join the Kagan opinion.

 

a few seconds ago

This is a case about how the Department of Health and Human Services calculates special Medicare payments to hospitals that serve a high percentage of low-income patients. And in particular, the case is a challenge to HHS’s interpretation of the phrases “entitled to” and “eligible for” to mean all patients who qualify for Medicare or Medicaid, even if those programs did not pay the patients’ hospital bills.

 

a few seconds ago

The Court upholds HHS's understanding of the "Medicare fraction."

 

a few seconds ago

This is a pretty technical case, but the stakes were high for the hospitals that receive Medicare payments – potentially to the tune of billions of dollars.

 

https://www.scotusblog.com/

Anonymous ID: b943a3 June 24, 2022, 7:06 a.m. No.16499946   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16499937

 

https://www.scotusblog.com/

 

a minute ago

HHS interpreted the statutory description of the Medicare fraction to mean that someone is entitled to benefits if he qualifies for Medicare, even when Medicare is not paying for part or all of his hospital stay.