tyb
Q / @Q
06/24/2022 10:06:27
Truth Social: 108532831868203533
https://qagg.news/?read=TO17669
Notable
notable
BREAKING: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, returns abortion issue to the states
by Grace Saldana June 24, 2022
On Friday morning, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling on the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case, effectively overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision as well as Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
In a 6-3 ruling, the court ruled in favor of returning the issue of abortion to the states to decide.
The majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, held “The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.”
“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division,” the majority opinion reads.
Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Breyer dissented.
Under the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, any matter that is not explicitly delegated to the federal government must be reserved for the states.
The text of the 10th Amendment reads:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
The premise of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is a challenge to a Mississippi law banning nearly all abortions after 15 weeks gestation.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the case in December and wrote a draft opinion last month which was illegally leaked to the press.
The draft opinion, which the court has authenticated, suggested that the court was prepared to hold that abortion is a state’s right. Left-wing activists immediately resorted to intimidation tactics and even violent means to show their disapproval of the potential coming decision. U.S. Marshals now stand guard at the justices’ homes.
A violent response is expected to result from the court overturning the federal legalization of abortions.
https://www.rsbnetwork.com/news/breaking-supreme-court-overturns-roe-v-wade-returns-abortion-issue-to-the-states/
Roberts was on Epstein's flight logs, not surprised.
And that asshole leaked it, before today because it wasn't going his way, satanic bastard.
The Muslim Satanic Fag is VERY upset, kek
Barack Obama / @BarackObama
06/24/2022 10:26:44
Twitter: 1540340651610497031
Barack Obama / @BarackObama
06/24/2022 10:26:42
Twitter: 1540340642848690176
Today, the Supreme Court not only reversed nearly 50 years of precedent, it relegated the most intensely personal decision someone can make to the whims of politicians and ideologues—attacking the essential freedoms of millions of Americans.
Barack Obama / @BarackObama
06/24/2022 10:26:43
Twitter: 1540340648972279813
Across the country, states have already passed bills restricting choice. If you're looking for ways to respond, @PPFA, @USOWomen, and many other groups have been sounding the alarm on this issue for years—and will continue to be on the front lines of this fight.
For more than a month, we’ve known this day was coming—but that doesn’t make it any less devastating. Here are my thoughts from when we first saw the draft ruling: https://barackobama.medium.com/my-statement-with-michelle-on-the-draft-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-94c0ae0c541a
https://qagg.news/?read=TH1753
Q, i need to know ja will be ok…
Q / @Q
06/24/2022 10:36:06
Truth Social: 108532948464781728
Q / @Q
06/24/2022 10:25:56
Truth Social: 108532908465003302
Updated for today… but only so far
America MUST ULTRA UNITE / @ChadKanera
06/24/2022 10:26:09
Truth Social: 108532909303779479
Q reTruthed…
https://qagg.news/?read=TO17708
Planned Parenthood Restructuring and Downsizing?
Wonder how fast stock will tank?
And how many will loose their jobs?
Does this mean a black market is being set up, now?
Driving it underground again….
Good questions to ask..
png shaking, cute
lose*
Queen Witch Face
Hillary Clinton / @HillaryClinton
06/24/2022 10:45:56
Twitter: 1540345483754872833
Hillary Clinton / @HillaryClinton
06/24/2022 10:45:55
Twitter: 1540345482186309632
Most Americans believe the decision to have a child is one of the most sacred decisions there is, and that such decisions should remain between patients and their doctors.
Today’s Supreme Court opinion will live in infamy as a step backward for women's rights and human rights.
Join me today in re-committing to help people access the care they need—and win elections at every level—to protect reproductive freedom for everyone in America.
https://secure.actblue.com/donate/after-roe
https://qagg.news/?read=TH1755
Fuck them, burn them down
Notable incoming FF?
whoa, ty
A short history of the morning-after pill in the United States
When Barack Obama was elected president of the United States at the end of 2008, many of his voters thought that they were going to change many things, among them issues related with women’s rights.
One of the areas where this expectation was highest was that of emergency contraception, i.e. in the use of the so-called “morning-after pill”, which as we know, can be used to prevented unwanted pregnancy after unprotected sexual intercourse.
The use of this pill was proposed in the United States in 1999, under the name Plan B. At that time, the pill could only be dispensed with a medical prescription. Essentially, Plan B consists of the administration of two 0.75 mg levonorgestrel pills, although later, in 2009, the go-ahead was given to administer it in a single 1.5 mg dose.
Its use is authorised for a period of up to 72 hours after sexual intercourse, although it is most effective the sooner the drug is taken, normally within the first 24 hours.
There has been intense controversy since then in American society regarding its effectiveness and safety, especially its mechanism of action, as many of the supporters of its use declared that it acted solely through a contraceptive mechanism, i.e. by impeding the production of a new living human being, while others, among whom we find ourselves, believe that together with this contraceptive mechanism, it can also act by an anti-implantation mechanism, i.e. by preventing the implantation of an already produced embryo in its mother’s womb. The ethical judgement that its use merits will depend largely by which of these mechanisms it acts, hence the controversy.
In 2001, at the request of the Center for Reproductive Rights, made up of a group of American lawyers and various civic associations (which brought together more than 70 medical and civil institutions), a petition was made to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the morning-after pill to be issued freely in pharmacies without a prescription. The Bush administration opposed this petition, stating that it required further research on the safety and efficacy of the pill, which meant that being able to issue it freely in pharmacies was delayed for over three years. This decision sparked intense political controversy between the Bush administration and various senators, especially Democrats, among whom Hillary Rodham Clinton had a major role. Finally, in 2006, the FDA approved the distribution of the morning-after pill without prescription, but only for women aged 18 years old or over.
When President Obama took over the American government on 20th January 2009, the Democratic administration publically stated that it did not want to interfere with the scientific evidence that appeared to support the medical effectiveness and safety of the morning-after pill, which led many of the defenders of this pill to think that a favourable decision would be taken with respect to its distribution without a prescription for women under 16 years old as well. Nevertheless, the FDA took nearly 3 years to make a decision in this respect, since it was not until December 2011 that it authorised the free distribution of the pill in pharmacies to all women, based on the fact that, in its opinion, the pill was safe and effective.
However, the Minister for Health in the Obama Government, Kathleen Sebelius, did not follow the FDA recommendations, and defended the decision that the morning-after pill not be dispensed pharmacies without a prescription to women under 17 years, which unleashed intense controversy among various feminist institutions and other civic associations.
Recently, one of these associations, the Center for Reproductive Rights reopened the case; the result was that, 14 months later, on 12th April this year (2013), a federal judge ruled that the morning-after pill could be dispensed without a prescription to all women, irrespective of age.
Thus, since Plan B was launched in the United States until this latest decision (to make the morning-after pill available without prescription), 12 years have passed.
The long period of time that has been required to take, in our opinion, such a negative decision, has its foundation in the ethical issues arising from the use of a drug in which the mechanism of action is anti-implantation, i.e. abortive, in some circumstances; according to our estimates, this is approximately 50% of the time or more, which constitutes a serious ethical difficulty for many individuals and various groups in the United States.
To this underlying reason we must add another: the great confusion sown by the information furnished by various researchers and media, who categorically state that levonorgestrel acts solely by preventing ovulation, so therefore it would not have an abortive effect. This statement, which the Bioethics Observatory and also many in research have repeatedly refuted, is supported by manufacturers, various groups that advocate contraception, and even by some media calling themselves Catholic, such as the National Catholic Reporters (NCR, Kansas City, Missouri), which last 31 March published an article stating that Plan B does not cause abortions.
Thus, it seems that the long history of the legalisation of the use of the morning-after pill without a prescription in the United States has come to an end, in our opinion a sad end, unless President Obama’s Justice Department appeals against the decision taken by the judge last 13th April, which seems highly unlikely.
Finally, it should be remembered that the ability to dispense the morning-after pill without a prescription has failed to accomplish any of the proposed objectives with its use in Western countries, as it has not managed to reduce the number of teenage pregnancies or abortions, but it has increased, according to various studies, the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases. They will probably see this same trend in the US when they analyse the consequences of this liberalisation.
https://bioethicsobservatory.org/2013/06/a-short-history-of-the-morning-after-pill-in-the-united-states/1108/
Can NOT find the Morning After Pill patent
https://www.uspto.gov/
The Morning-After Pill: A Well-Kept Secret
https://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/10/magazine/the-morning-after-pill-a-well-kept-secret.html
Donald Trump Jr. / @DonaldJTrumpJr
06/24/2022 11:27:01
Truth Social: 108533148627012944
Fuck around and find out!!!