>It was all written in latin? why, because people could not read it.
It was written in Hebrew and Greek. It was later translated to Latin.
The original documents indicate he died on a stauros (σταυρός).
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives without government restriction.
Lawrence v. Texas Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that sanctions of criminal punishment for those who commit sodomy are unconstitutional.
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
>a great f'n mind control game
I've got no dispute with you or most of what you wrote, Anon. I was just providing some clarifying information. Believe what you will.
>so what is the link between these and the Roe decision?
Justice Thomas wrote: "For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell."
What connects them is 'substantive due process'.
"In United States constitutional law, substantive due process is a principle allowing courts to protect certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if procedural protections are present or the rights are unenumerated (i.e., not specifically mentioned) elsewhere in the US Constitution. Courts have identified the basis for such protection from the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, which prohibit the federal and state governments, respectively, from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". Substantive due process demarcates the line between the acts that courts hold to be subject to government regulation or legislation and the acts that courts place beyond the reach of governmental interference."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process
>>>16497837 (You) pb
>Democrat Party destroys itself; untethered from Common Law, Tradition, America, Constitution
>So the usurpers thereby dissolve themselves.
The irony is that [They] are the ones who declared an insurrection followed by making it 'impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings'. They are indeed freely producing the solvent by which they dissolve themselves.
>It didn't "Overturn" Shit did it?
The opinion in the case Roe v Wade established that the US Constitution guarantees a 'woman's right to privacy' and therefore guarantees a woman's right to an abortion. That has now been overturned. It was invented BS anyway. The new case opinion establishes that no such right exists in the US Constitution. Now the states are free to amend their own constitutions or write their own laws on the matter. Those that object to abortion may codify that objection into law without violating the US Constitution. As you say, "The States have the Power to decide. We can look to this ruling today to reinforce it."