Anonymous ID: d28365 June 24, 2022, 1:08 p.m. No.16502754   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3013

>>16502534

I have gay clients, they had shared finances and othet problems without being able to taje care of each other in sickness etc. The SC could have called it a legal union instead of marriage and achieved the same thing. But they the biblical term and violated peopleโ€™s faith.

 

An atty friend has lot of wealthy gay clients and they didny want gay marriages because they be subject to alimony etc.