Probably be a very long list.
One aspect that seems to be overlooked is the fact that they went back to basics with the law rather than use 'stare decisis' or legal precedent [Latin, Let the decision stand.] The policy of courts to abide by or adhere to principles established by decisions in earlier cases. (a doctrine or policy of following rules or principles laid down in previous judicial decisions unless they contravene the ordinary principles of justice).
Basically they decided on the facts and law rather than just following a decision made in another case.
Each and every case should be based on its own merits and facts and not on those of a preceding case.
Incrementally over a long period of time one poor decision gets used as a precedent for another, and then another, and so on.
This is an infiltration of the legal system much like the way the education and health systems have been infiltrated.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Stare+decisis
I would say that the use of the SC originally was illegitimate overreach to overturn the lower courts.
Lawfare at its worse as in many other cases. A decision is made that upsets someone so they use corrupted legal system to overturn that decision.
That 'final decision' is then used as tool to make more bad decisions, because you are not allowed to contradict the previous court and show them up as a bunch of idiots.
>Wise anon being wise
TY
I've been called many things in my life (often rude things) but this is the first time I've been called wise. :D
That's an A-4 not an F-4 Phantom.
kek ty
F-15E Eagle
F-22 for ya.
Nice saved.