>>16507178 <~~~
Ok guys, another Non-Trip post, responding to "Q"…with TOR. We're gonna need better confirmation than what we're gettin'…because methinks there's some fuckery afoot.
Hate to pump the brakes on the happy train…but, this can't be overlooked until there is a satisfactory response and explanation.
>You've got a point anon.
I'm not trying to be a Debbie Downer, but with all the fuckery that has gone on and is currently going on…we gotta scrutinize EXTRA hard.
>Obviously Tor has been turned back on.
Except I tested TOR, and still can't post…so, someone has special permission.
Is it actually Q, or are we being fucked with? Because the TOR poster has responded to Q twice now in separate breads…but only after Q posted. So…this needs to be sorted out.