Waiting patiently for a Q post with a Delta from PDJT. And as a reminder, the Q post should come first, then the PDJT post, not vice versa.
Oh wait. Fuck. I couldn't Tor post because I tried to upload an image. Stupid me. No image posting on Tor. This should work now.
Anybody else feeling light-headed? Been feeling that way since Q started posting. What a mind rush! Omigod! Q is back! Just how awesome is that?
My hands are sweating. Things just got serious. Need to go for a walk.
>keep your emotions in check
Nah. Haven't been excited about anything for quite a while.
I want the excitement even if the Q posts turn out to be phoney. Doubt it, though, but I guess anything is possible at this point.
here i am posting on tor, no im not Q.
anyone can post on tor. 0 id doesnt mean anything.
though it is strange Qs return after so long absent is also his first time posting using tor. wonder why he choose to do it that way.
huh, thats strange, im using tor but my id isnt 0….
guess it isnt just tor that does that then, my mistake
>huh, thats strange, im using tor but my id isnt 0….
I see zeroes. I see zeroes for my own posts. Software fuckery somewhere.
Jim says let's have an AMA over the evidence he is connected to Doge/Austin/Babyfist, here are the responses
>TYB
Question 1
>>>/qresearch/16485912 (Deleted by BV)
>Talk to us about all of this.
JW Response
>I don't know Jacob Chansley (Angeli)
>He asked me a question at the Qcon during the question-and-answer period. I remember it was about child trafficking and he was a good speaker.
>There were about three million people in Washington DC on January 6 attending President Trump's speech, and marching to the Capital.
>Bloody hands are also used by American Indian women to signify a silenced mouth and human trafficking.
Question 2
>>>/qresearch/16485931 (screenshots from the website SHAMAN Starseed - which connects MJ12/Austin S./QAnon Shaman/Baron of Arizona/B is for Baron)
JW Response
>Wow, you spend to much time being a Jim groupie. That time could be better spent getting some tendies, or going outside.
Question 3
>Or tell us why you thought it was a funny joke to invoke Kappy in the Meta thread a few nights ago, when you have direct connection to the person rumored to be behind his death?
JW Response
>Brother, you need some help? I don't believe your sources have been honest with you.
>I'm not the key to this puzzle. Ask the guy in the bug costume some of this. He might understand more.
>I'm not a qanon personality. In fact I am suspicious of those that call themselves that, because you know.
>Q and anon etc. I believe the Soros and Media matters are behind weaponizing qanon, and gullible people like Steinbart, are there to fall into the trap.
Question 4
>>>/qresearch/16486017 (Response Showing Jim is connected to Shoenberger, and did invoke Isaac Kappy)
JW Response
>Your chi is weak.
>The true qanon jenkum will give you your strength back.
Question 5
>If Doge and BabyFist have no connection why did Doge bake the first ever bread on /deepdigs/ and why does Babyfist connecte to that board?
JW Response
>I'm sick of reading your same crap over and over again, and yet it doesn't get deleted, because you are a low grade shill. Drink up and enjoy the savory aroma.
>They are users of this website. They have no access other than user-level like you.
>I'm certain the three-letter agencies post on this website and try to cause trouble.
Question 6
Why did the B post happen on the Exact same day as Doge made his first appearance?
>Don't overthink that. The B guy had access to Babyfist's computer and did that as a global volunteer. Babyfist was a volunteer then. He is not a volunteer now.
>I am not telepathic.
IP hashes have proven with sauce that Doge aka Austin was posting from the same IP address as Babyfist.
Question 7
>Jim, how well do you know Thomas Schoenberger? How well do you know the company ShadowBox a rent cyber attack back larping company harrassing and pulling off psyops?
>or Silent Partner, a subverted company inside that company?
>When you interviewed did you not know?
>Or do you still not know?
>If you know now will you disavow Thomas?
No Response
Question 8
>Jim, why did you interview someone who makes "music for infants" that has "hidden messages" in it?
>You seem to know more about him than I do.
>All I did was google his name, Jim. You spoke to him for over an hour. How do you know him? Why did you interview him?
>Do you watch my show? I talk to all sorts of people. If it is any consolation, I barely remember the interview because I didn't get along with him.
Question 9
>1. Do you acknowledge that babyfist and/or someone associated with him used his global volunteer account to post on Q's private board?
>2. Do you acknowledge that you fired babyfist for this reason?
>3. If you fired babyfist for this reason, do you acknowledge that a global volunteer posting on a private board goes against your internal policies for GV's?
>4. Did you investigate how this was allowed to happen? Did you ask babyfist who made the unauthorized post?
>5. Re: 'that is not my board to edit.' It was not babyfist's board to edit either. Why was nothing done beyond firing babyfist?
JW Response
>Well, sounds like you have been listening to the shills who keep asking these questions, even after I have answered them. Some of them on this very thread. I'm not going to waste cycles retyping it. Read the back log.
>Go to Tora3.com/newsnetwork and look at the video on February 17. It includes a conversation with babyfist. It's the one the shills always say is porno. You know the image. It gets posted a lot.
>Don't ask again. I am not going to answer again.
Question 10
>Jim, if a landlord broke into a tenant's house without the tenant's permission and took a shit on their bed, should he not clean it up?
>Why is it ok to delete things on this board, which belongs to all anons, but it's not ok to delete a post on a private board, that was made by someone other than the Board Owner?
>Unless you believe the Board Owner (Q) is the same person as the one who made the "B" post (babyfist's "fren") why would you leave the post up?
>Fuck off scatophile.
>That was a legit question - not a scatophile post.
>The reasoning behind the B post remaining hasn't ever been fully explained.
>And it matters because of Q's history detailed in the drops of how he reacts to board fuckery of that kind.
>It's not my board, and I dealt with it as I did.
>I made that decision, and I am not going to change it. Q can come back and delete it if he wants.
Question 11
>Are you aware of a warrant canary question's existence?
>I don't play that warrant canary game.
Warrant Canary is at the bottom of every bread, how could Jim not know this?
BO/BV is here. Just saw a post get deleted.
>>16509852
You getting deleted.
>Looked like a lot of ugly and faggy whites.
They can't get laid so they pretend to be pregnant and desperate for an abortion.
Social rejects.