just going to repost this
>>16506723 lb
this
hate to be a wet blanket but this is why I think we need proof that this is really Q…
because if Biden really is in control, and Q is posting.. [they] can use that against us, and I wouldn't blame them. that would be legitimate seditious and possibly treasonous activity (even tho Biden was illegitimately sworn in).
but if Biden ISN'T in control, then this is proof of devolution. Q, as a military operation, is being run by the true leader of the military: President Trump.
handle with care, anons
so far, i'm seeing these pointers signaling to legit Q:
>The timestamp of Q's first post matching timestamp of previous post referencing abortion
>The timing of Roe v. Wade, "sky event", and Pope rumors
>Devin Nunes posting 2-3 times #WheresDan today
>B post being deleted from /projectdcomms/
and to a lesser extent, this
>Devin Nunes posting "coupe" potatoes and "cucumbers" (Q-cumbers)
>Devin Nunes reTruthing a post that hints at Trump "really" being charge (aka devolution)
i'm seeing these things casting doubt on this being legit Q:
>Q TOR posting, even tho TOR posting had been turned off
>Apparently TOR posting was turned on the day Q before Q returned… indicating coordination between site/board admin + Q which would defy "no outside comms"
>Q hasn't yet revealed any new information that only Q would know (proof)
>No deltas with President Trump on TS or even a hint towards Q by Dan on twitter
>the timing of Q's return, after Jim's AMA and anons questioning his trustworthiness due to connections to seedy people + those groups (notably including babyfist, from whose GV account the B post was made) making cryptic hints at "future projects"/reveals etc.
handle with care, trust but verify
i've asked Q for clear verification here, let's see what happens.