>>16510712 (PB)
>thats why the post got deleted today, right?
>Careful what [you] wish for
kek
B post getting deleted confirms it was fuckery
confirming babyfist is fuckery agent
confirming Jim aided and abetted said fuckery
but keep kvetching and exposing your little LARP
>so we're just going to treat these Q posts as legitimate without any verification?
the bread is titlesVerification Requestedanon
many anons have been banting about the need for confirmation since the drops started
check the notes
>>16509449, >>16509513, >>16509564, >>16509622, >>16509681, >>16509716 Waiting patiently for a Q proof with a Delta from PDJT…. reminder, the Q post should come first, then the PDJT post, not vice versa
>>16509951, >>16510154, >>16510172, >>16510243, >>16510350 Dan Scavino Truths on SCOTUS ruling (Googled Baby Fist?)
logical thinking always anon
indeed anon
the trip has been cracked before
and it has been re-verified too
this is one of the re-verifications
(re-post from notables)
>BO, has anyone asked you about Tor posting being enabled on the board?
it has been asked many times
an anon last bread says he saw something in the notables about it being tuned on yesterday
I have not seen the sauce myself on the timing for TOR posting being tuned back on
but
since "Q" posted
many anons have succesfully TOR posted
>no, i mean in the dough, where Q's posts are listed
gotcha anon
agreed
asterisk is not a bad idea at this point
most of the returning eyes are not going to have the time to sift through the breads of nuance
should probably be asterisk'd until officially confirmed via anon interaction with Q
>Wait, tor posting was turned on yesterday?
thats the word on the street
but I have not seen the sauce yet
>The odds of this timing, top kek.
correct anon
"just a coincidence" right?
topkek
>yep, maybe you can post a bun with all previous discussion + Dan's post on TS and link to that?
its almost done already right out of the notables buns….
>>16509449, >>16509513, >>16509564, >>16509622, >>16509681, >>16509716 Waiting patiently for a Q proof with a Delta from PDJT…. reminder, the Q post should come first, then the PDJT post, not vice versa
>>16509951, >>16510154, >>16510172, >>16510243, >>16510350 Dan Scavino Truths on SCOTUS ruling (Googled Baby Fist?)
fairly certain thats all the relevent stuff…?
the absolute state
>It's like they only think about the current move in a game of chess, rather than thinking 5 moves ahead. KEK!
either Q eventually responds to us and BTFO out of our questions by actually confirming themselves
or they never adress the issue and remain fake and ghey
chess indeed anon
>looks like they got it worked out
interesting timing for it being "worked on" for over a year
babyfist confirms reference to themselves from Scavino truth
are you fucking kidding me?
my post is already deleted?
why the FUCK was this post deleted?
>>16511002
>>16511002
>>16511002
and BV Dart is deleting the references
>We did what was requested.
>Q will one day tell you (If you have not seen already.)
>Some digest slowly.
>P2 is starting.
cicada larps failing bigly
>Am I reading this right?
essentially
yes
although babyfist has been the subject of much digging the past week-month
babyfist was proven to be
and then admitted to
being theBposter that defiled Q's private board /projectdcomms/ with THIS post
this post consequenctly got deleted today
and Dan Scavino DID indeed post an image of a "babyfist"
insterestingly enough
if you google the search term 'baby fist'
this image is one of the first images returned
things that make you go hmmmmmmmm
>THIS post
>if you google the search term 'baby fist'
BO/BV
DART
explain yourselves
why did you delete this post?
>Dan did not reply to Babyfist
Dan called out babyfist after the first "Q" drops in almost 2 years
either its an endorsement of babyfist (kek)
or its calling out the LARP
but to call it un-related is LITERALLY retarded
digits czek'd
>This means the tripcode algo or salt must have been changed, there is no other way, otherwise it would still work and I would get the same trip, which has been Notables!!QVF6T.FX0A.
OHH FUCK FUCK FUCK
BV TRIPLE A CONFIRMS
8kun tripcode salt got rotated before NEW "Q" drops!!!!!!
FUCKERY
>I have been using the super secure trip since the start, but when I try it now it fails and is blocked on here.
FUCKING NOTABLE
'''8kun tripcode salt rotated before new "Q" s?
this
can anyone else that uses a tripcode here on the kun double confirm this for us?
kekbees?
tubbaks?
>But it would appear that I too have a new trip assigned to my IP?
>As confirmed by posting on DD with a new ID w/o VPN
DOGE CONFIRMS
8kun tripcode salt got MOTHERFUCKING rotated before the NEW "Q" drops niggers!
>And to add to that:
>[if the 8kun tripcode salt gets ROTATED]
>Q / "Q" should - unless I'm missing something - get a different tripcode as well, but doesn't.
that is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT anon
if the salt got rotated
that means Q's tripcode passphrase would get a NEW different tripcode
FUCKERY
new Q's are faked
tripcode salt has been rotated by admin
8kun tripcode salt got rotated before new Q's
they were faked anon
it has now been proven
>You know how to verify if it's the real Q on your own.
8kun tripcode salt got rotated
but new Q uses OLD SALT tripcode
fake and ghey conformed
>I just edited my own post for confirmation that I am who I say I am.
5:5 Triple A
chek'm anons
>The claim of the poster being a BV and the claim of the Salt being rotated needs more sauce to make the notables.
second witness (BV) Doge confirms: >>16511154
>dude if you were having all these issues why not share that with anons?
people have lives anon
how the fuck was BV anon supposed to know the first "muhQ" drops in two years were about to drop
>They got the tripcode that’s for sure
the tripcode salt got rotated just before the new "Q"s anon
does that change your assesment?
>BV Triple-A here.
>I can confirm.
>This means the tripcode algo or salt must have been changed
>Doge
>But it would appear that I too have a new trip assigned to my IP?
>Is Doge a BV
Doge is a BO of his own board /deepdigs/ yes
the tripcode salt on 8kun is SITE-WIDE
ALL boards use the same SALT for tripcode generation
>Still DOD servers right?
Nope
Not since Jan 2021
check the traceroute yourself
everything goes straight to vanwatech now/
no DoD IP's
>Yes… now expand your thinking
to what, Doge?
the salt got rotated
but Q has tripcode from the OLD salt
what does that tell (You)?
>the site is giving a different tripcode back, despite my secret being the same
shouldnt it be the same for Q then
Q uses the shared secret
the new salt should generate a new tripcode based on Q's shared secret from two years ago, correct?
>I just came back. Around 8 hours ago I contacted BO, had no idea what's going on. I only saw the Q posts a few minutes ago before I started posting on here.
>First I thought great Q is back.
>Then I thought wait, why is the trip the same as before, that makes no sense.
5:5 Triple-A
tyvm for sharing
see something
say something
as always
we unravel the truth together
WWG1WGA
>But in fact I posted about tripcode not working around 8 hours ago already, see here
>>16504764 (notables thread)
chek'd
CONFIRMED
>Where's the rest of the BVs and BO to collaborate.
>CONFIRMATION ON SALT FUCKERY, MY IP HASH HAS CHANGED.
check the pics related
more confirmation of 8kun salt rotation
you can agree or disagree all you want
the salt got rotated
we are now up to 5 tripcode users that have reported their tripcode output for the same password has changed
>This was purposely done while Jim was on stage giving a speech, so he would have plausible deniability.
this
>What if it was Q that rotated the salts?
then Q would post with the new tripcode that was generated with the new salt
why do you think Q has different tripcodes over time?
salt rotation anon
and he confirmed iden after roration every time
>So, Q could not rotate the salts and make sure that only the Q tripcode stayed the same?
cryptographically
by definition
no