So >>16511372 lb is saying what?

1. all old trips no longer valid, because tripcode algo or salt were changed

2. someone created tripcodes until they got the one matching Q's old trip

3. they used it to post "as" Q

But

1. BO disagrees with this.

If someone created a vast number of tripcodes until they got the same as (old/real) Q then it should be recorded somewhere, surely?

Also who made the changes which BV Triple-A claims happened just before someone rolled enough times to finally get the same trip as Q?

Am I missing anything (answer is probably yes)?

Also in reply to >>16511495 lb

Re "baby fist" google results

I was unable to replicate the google search showing that b&w photo as first result for "baby fist", it wasnt even on the top 3 lines, however I did get the b&w pic 3rd, top row, when I searched "baby fist bump." Can other anons check?

I am on desktop, this anon says it won't show on mobile >>16511479 lb

Not that bothered, Q will either confirm or not, or others might clarify things later. Personally though am not taking the "baby fist" photo as meaningful since not able to replicate.

Bullshit baffles brains

But wait, there's more!

>>16511621

What if "real" Q genuinely lost their password, maybe in Jan 2021, and, knowing no-one would accept them unless they used the old trip, had to pull some hardcore fuckery with salt/algo to access the tripcode, then unfucked their own fuckery afterwards?

I am unable to replicate the "baby fist" photo as first Google result, neither can spouseanon on clearnet mobile when I asked, so I'm not accepting that as a "signature" until given something a bit more substantial.

>>16511656

> Easily done by posting Q proofs until undeniable. The shared secret is not the only verification method

Would look pathetic though anon, imagine the scene:

"Look it's me it's Q, look no really though, here's the receipt for my watch, erm, erm, here's my backstage pass for (insert MAGA event"… I don't think it would have worked, and the terrible fucking optics would have fed into the "Q is a larping tard" narrative, instead of "Q knows Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming" (etc).

I mean "look no honest it's me guys, reallyyy" isn't very "Patriots In Control"!

So for now I'm going with my "this is Q forgot the name of his first pet" theory because that "Google search is proof of baby fist" doesn't seem bulletproof.

Also, if Q is what they claim, they seem most able to alter the salt/algo, game it to get a trip matching the old, then set things back, which is what I take to have happened here >>16511613

>>16511712

> Jim is in on the larp fakeQ. It's pretty simple.

If you think Q can be fake that means you accept old pre-2021 Q is/was real, and therefore so is the Trump Q connection.

So you're telling me Jim Watkins for no reason at all is pissing off DJT, still the MAGA Kingmaker, by larping as Q, at the time his own son is running for office?

For what purpose?

So far all we know is some people claim the salt was rotated, though BO says not, and some anons say they have experienced their user ID change, but then, change back.

Do previous salt rotations done normally not just permanently trash the old salt?

Genuinely curious here, I have no great investment either way, truth matters more than hopium.

>>16511714

Ad hom and not answering my questions about what may have happened, weak.

>>16511708

Your reply doesn't make sense in the context of what I asked though?

>>16511746

So the hypothetical larper from yesterday would have to be able to do salt rotation, and then somehow set it back as it was, which is why BO didn't see it happen?

>>16511791

BO would surely be aware there was a rotation, are there not backend logs of some kind showing when these happen? I'm not trying to say it didn't happen, obviously I have no way to verify, I am curious why the replies on lb were conflicting about that.

>>16511761

1. who the fuck are you lol and 2. oh no mockery on an imageboard, whatever next how will I survive.

How am I "demoralization" when I'm saying the whole "this image Dan posted means it wasn't Q" thing doesn't hold water?

I've given reasons why, and asked anons to run the same search themselves on Google Images, and I'm asking questions, not trying to be self-appointed dictator of what anons may say or do. Unlike you.

>>16511800

>Q would NOT expect us to just accept the new posts as being from him, especially with this huge question over the tripcode. Anyone saying we should just accept that it's Q is either a shill or a retard!! If it is Q then he will find a way to prove it.

Fact.

If you get time try Google Images "baby fist" (no quotes when you search it) and see if that black and white picture is first for you? I was unable to replicate it, it appears to be what the "this wasn't real Q" argument hinges on.

>>16511865

Maybe so fren, I did search just after the Google results & Scavino were mentioned as a "proof" this wasn't Q, so that's a pretty quick change.

Time will tell, but asking questions is always good, only shills and tards hate that.

>>16511963

>What does the baby fist image have to do with the Q (?) post?

Scavino posted an image of a someone bumping fists with a baby regarding the overturning of Roe v. Wade. It was claimed that was the first image result, in Google, for the search term "baby fist" and that this means it's a user called "babyfist." I was unable to replicate that search despite trying right after seeing the claim and neither could spouseanon when I called her, so not convinced at present.

Didn't see this yet

Nigerian politician one of two people charged with conspiring to harvest the organs of a child in the UK

Beatrice Nwanneka Ekweremadu, 55, and Ike Ekweremadu, 60, were remanded in custody and were expected to appear at Uxbridge Magistrates' Court today.

A Nigerian politician is one of two people charged with allegedly conspiring to harvest the organs of a child in the UK.

District senator and lawyer Ike Ekweremadu, 60, has been charged alongside Beatrice Nwanneka Ekweremadu, 55 with conspiracy to arrange and/or facilitate travel of another person with a view to exploitation.

The pair were remanded in custody and were due to appear at Uxbridge Magistrates' Court today.

Charges were brought against the pair, who are from Nigeria, following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police's Specialist Crime team.

The politician was recently made a visiting professor at the University of Lincoln.

https://news.sky.com/story/man-and-woman-charged-with-conspiring-to-bring-child-to-the-uk-to-harvest-organs-met-police-say-12638989

>>16512233

Check the notables, top of this bread fren. Links to past posts and clockfaggin.