>>16511483 (PB)
>if
yes, correct
>then (?)
nope
never once in a million years
you cant put the tripcode back into the salt to get the shared secret
the scrambling only works one way
>>16511483 (PB)
>if
yes, correct
>then (?)
nope
never once in a million years
you cant put the tripcode back into the salt to get the shared secret
the scrambling only works one way
>>16511488 (PB)
>But what does that meeeeeeeaaaan? Help a tard out.
you have a password
8kun has what is called "salt"
salt scrambles your password into a cryptographically unique code, called a tripcode
salt will always scramble a password the same way
until it is rotated
when the salt is rotated
it scrambles differently
everyone uses their same password
but gets a NEW unique tripcode as an output from the salt
the salt on 8kun got rotated BEFORE the new Q drops
the NEW Q drops use the OLD tripcode that comes from the OLD salt
because the salt has been rotated
Q's tripcode should now be DIFFERENT
you will notice that Q's tripcode has changed more than a few times over the course of the drops
a few of those changed have been for exactly this reason
chan site salt rotation
every single time that happens
Q gets a new tripcode
andRE_CONFIRMStheir posting identity using delta's with DJT social media (Dan Scavino)
ERGO
the new "Q" posts today were faked
see: >>16511378 (PB)
>So what are the new crumbs? Letโs go!
there arent any
the new Q drops were fake and gay
>That B post on projectdcomms has been deletedโฆ Someone help.
LARP wars in full effect
8kun tripcode salt got rotated before the "new" Q's
except the new Q's use tripcode from the OLD salt?
dafuq?
its fake and ghey anon
>Prove it actually was a salt rotation
how many tripcode users need to report their tripcodes have changed?
no
not assumption
8kun site tripcode salt has been rotated
only admin account can do that
ergo
Jim did it
or allowed his admin account to be used to do it
perhaps Jim will tell us about how his account got hacked in some number of hours
I wont hold my breath
I noticed the same thing in the META bread anon
I have over 120 posts in that thing
as of 3 hours ago my post count was down to 3
looked around
and sometime today I got a new UID for this IP address
still on the same cleanet ISP
checked my public IP
hasnt changed
fuckery indeed
see: >>16511589
>If new crumbs match events then thatโs that.
agreed
3 new drops from today did not contain any crumbs
interestingly enough
>which is why im confused when i go back to that bread and instead of the 2 different id's i had, they're all now just the 1
I am NOT experiencing that part of it/
I still see two different UID's for me in the relevent breads where things switched
THAT is fucking weird
>he won't post on this board again and he did
with the old tripcode after a salt rotation
if you dont understand what that means
we cant help you
>That was because I literally asked Q to delete it.
kek
so did I
this was from my phone out on the road
so no (You) from my laptop
but
CAP related
kek
>Although I agree with you, it doesn't explain why the B post was deleted.
you want a good reference?
how about Jims answer to the question in his latest AMA bread?
>>16486456 (anon question)
>The reasoning behind the B post remaining hasn't ever been fully explained.
>>16486492 (Jims answer)
>It's not my board, and I dealt with it as I did.
okayโฆ
>I made that decision, and I am not going to change it.
roger thatโฆ
>Q can come back and delete it if he wants.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
apply that answer to what you have seen today
8kun salt rotation with no announcement of any kind RIGHT BEFORE Q's first post in 2 years
Q's posts have the OLD tripcode from the OLD salt
Q is TOR posting
TOR posting has been turned off for over a year
but somehow, magically, that also got tunred on site-wide right before these Q posts
and then this answer the the question about the B post
are you surprised the fake Q "decided" to delete the B post?
without making -ANY- comment about it in the drops?
think logically anon
reconcile
correct
>You guys have forgotten how to ask Q for proof.
some of us have not forgotten, anon
>>16509449, >>16509513, >>16509564, >>16509622, >>16509681, >>16509716 Waiting patiently for a Q proof with a Delta from PDJTโฆ. reminder, the Q post should come first, then the PDJT post, not vice versa
ohh I expect the notables to get a THOUROUGH cleaning come morning shift
kek
archive offline
as we were taught by realQ
here is a partial example of how salt rotation was handled/treated in the past
read the fucking red box you lazy fucks
THIS IS WHAT RE_CONFIRMATION AFTER SALT ROTATION LOOKS LIKE
in case you dont rememberโฆ.
>Hey, just seen this. Whatโs the status on so far?
8kun salt got rotated before the new Q's
every single tripcode user on the site has a new tripcode now (because of the tripcode salt being rotated)
for some reason
Q posted with the OLD tripcode
Qshouldhave a NEW tripcode because of the salt rotation
the salt rotation was not announced by admin
anons are discovering it by attempting to use their tripcode passwords and finding the resulting trip is now different
up to 5 reports across many boards now
Triple-A from notables thread here
Doge from /deepdigs/
elENoCHle from /pen/
kekbees on his board (I forget the name)
8bit confirms
all reporting confirmed 8kun salt rotation
>which is why BO didn't see it happen?
BO doesnt see it because BO doesnt use a tripcode
BO = board owner
as in the /qresearch/ board
SALT rotation is NOT [board level]
SALT rotation is [site level]
as in
it applies to the entire website
every single board affected
period
ONLY [site admin] has SALT rotation priveledges
only two options
Jim did it (or gave order to someone else to do it with his account creds)
-or-
Jim's admin account got haxxored
THATS IT
those are the only two options
>Read underneath the red box anon..
I saved the drop for a reason anon
>>7359370
/pf/ was taken down [cleared of content] just prior to platform TERM [specific reason].
NAT SEC [charter] prevents use of 'keys' to establish IDEN via public utility/domain - non_reg.
==Formation of 'clean' board possible to lock in trip(s) issues w/ safeguards. ==
Q
and thenโฆ
Q3629
New board created [pending approval /CM/]
/projectDcomms/
Q
>Formation of 'clean' board possible to lock in trip(s) > issues w/ safeguards.
>So Q would post on comms not here?
not necessarily
but there was an outstanding violation of Q's private board
that post by poster "B"
which has not been deleted
as of today
I'm going to sleep anons
a lot of salt rotation stuff in the notables and the last two breads if interested
stay frosty
logical thinking always
see something
say something
o7
>Who knew that it was possible to post on TOR?
that had also NOT been announced prior to the Q drops using TOR