Anonymous ID: 1de95f June 6, 2018, 11:33 a.m. No.1651515   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

well, if part of our job from Q was to wake people up to not just blindly voting blue, I'd say we did pretty well. Dem's seem to be a little nervous about last night's "unexpected" turnout

Anonymous ID: 1de95f June 6, 2018, 12:09 p.m. No.1651837   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1868

>>1651813

they can't be legit. Let's apply our shilly friends "critical thinking"

 

No voter who voted for Cox or Allen voted for Feinstein. But according to these numbers, they almost all did. A side-by-side "proof" of these voting numbers looks very shady

Anonymous ID: 1de95f June 6, 2018, 12:14 p.m. No.1651882   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1989

>>1651813

here's one major problem. On my CA ballot, Feinstein was the ONLY choice. I had no choice but to leave it blank. So, people who feel a need to mark every section would've voted for her. The other ballots would remain blank, allowing them to adjust as needed?