>>16513354

It can never hurt, and could possibly help, to be skeptical about any important claim (like "Q is posting"), and skeptical about any evidence presented (like "tripcode proves it was Q".)

Either way, I hope we can discuss all possibilities logically and not emotionally. I also think there will be signs of affirmation or negation coming from the accounts we watch on Truth Social (like Kash, Nunes, Scavino) about whether to trust these new Q posts.

One aspect that I have not seen discussed yet: Someone who made no claim to identity was posting q-like posts (similar to Q's style) earlier that same day. See

>>16502998 pb , >>16502322 pb , >>16502723 pb , >>16502777 pb , >>16503198 pb

This reminded me of the time during March-July 2021 when q-like posts were being made, and those posts were aggressively attacked by the BVs. So aggressively attacked that it was obvious the BVs were acting from ulterior motives, and suppressing free discussion. I think that whole situation is what caused FastJack big censorship crackdown and banning spree, and it was why the fake post was made on Q's locked board. It was all to distract from the anonymous mystery posts that seemed to be coming from a legitimate source. Those mystery posts also claimed that the site owner or BO had intentionally disabled the use of Q's tripcode, so it was no longer possible for Q to post here.

So anyway, one possibility is that Q team (or other legitimate helpers in a position of knowledge) are starting to post actual info here again without a tripcode, and if the people in charge of this board/site are against that happening for some reason, maybe they decided to pull out their last card and create posts with Q's old tripcode. (Vague, short, meaningless posts that do not predict anything or provide any real information.) Time will tell. I hope it's actually Q, but keeping all possibilities in mind for now.