>>16513659 lb
>Why people insist on Q being a predicter, I can't figure out.
single best way to ridicule/destroy cred.
all the memes, all the attacks, it all rests on 'predictions'.
having read the Q posts, they obviously are more than just that.
>>16513659 lb
>Why people insist on Q being a predicter, I can't figure out.
single best way to ridicule/destroy cred.
all the memes, all the attacks, it all rests on 'predictions'.
having read the Q posts, they obviously are more than just that.
> don't do anything
i guess that would be a close second, if not a tie.
There are literally dozens of Q posts inciting to action, to organize, to get out there and be loud.
But, keep on lying about how it's all either a failed prediction, or an 'order to do nothing'
fucking Based.
had fun copypasting 'things Q told us to do', for a while… but there was so much of it, couldn't keep up. Great mission.
>and can’t believe it’s still floating around
why are you having a hard time understanding that the most useful lies are used and re-used again and again
work on that personal discernment
meh, just one word isn't strong a connect enough
>and it degrades the credibility of otherwise smart and effective people, not to mention the whole movement by proxy. That’s why.
Yes.
That's the entire purpose.
Also, debating the validity of the term 'qanon' is a great way not to have to adress ANY of the content in there. Destroy cred, distract away from potent material… etc