dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Jim, Ron, Austin Steinbart, Babyfist & Qanon Shaman all connected.

>>>/hivemind/19105

>>>/hivemind/18991

https://8kun.top/hivemind/res/19105.html#19137

Archive 1: https://archive.ph/752pY

Archive 2: https://archive.ph/Gt6jL

Archive 3: https://web.archive.org/web/20220618044544/https://8kun.top/hivemind/res/19105.html

Archive 4: https://archive.st/archive/2022/6/8kun.top/hcql/8kun.top/hivemind/res/19105.html#19148.html

MJ12/Ingersol Larpwood Archive

https://web.archive.org/web/20210808103306/https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/14089443.html

It appears Austin Steinbart is "Sgt. B"

https://tubes.we1.cloud/?cat=9

https://web.archive.org/web/20220618025901/https://tubes.we1.cloud/?cat=8

Baron of Arizona aka Austin Steinbart

https://web.archive.org/web/20220618025355/https://tubes.we1.cloud/?cat=9

QAnon Shaman

Shaman Starseed

https://tubes.we1.cloud/?cat=10

https://web.archive.org/web/20220618030032/https://tubes.we1.cloud/?cat=10

Janon Twitter mentioning FastJack

https://web.archive.org/web/20220618032432/https://twitter.com/PortForPink/status/1537340086509273088

B is for Baron

https://tubes.we1.cloud/?p=2195

Austin Steinbart/Baron of Arizona/Sgt B - Arizona

Jacob Chansley/Jake Angelli/Qanon Shaman/Starseed Shaman - Arizona

Jim Watkins - Arizona

Ron Watkins - Arizona

Babyfist/Laughing_Man - Arizona/Colorado

Phoenix Enigma/ Corey Daniels - Arizona

Defango - spends a LOT of time in Arizona

Andre Merlecru - Arizona

Isaac Kappy Suicide - Arizona

Weird how this entire website is all about

https://tubes.we1.cloud/

Jake Angelli

Austin Steinbart

Weird how they are all connected to Jim

Weird how so many posts on the site have the same flavor of shit that BabyFist, Doge post

Weird how there is a big ass header that says "B is for Baron"

Weird how Jim told us it was Babyfist that made the B post Qs board

Weird how Jim now tries to act like it was someone else

Weird how Jim did a podcast with these people 3 days before the B post was made

Weird how in META 3 days ago when questioned on who he was Jim said "Kappy of course" referring to Isaac Kappy who was murdered in AZ

Weird how they all live in Arizona

Weird how Jim would hang out with them in a hotel room after the breach

Weird how Doge, Babyfist and Sgt. B were all caught sharing IP addresses

Weird how all of them appeared at the same time Ingersol Larpwood operation on Q research happened

Weird how it all coincided with Fake Q posts popping up on Q research that are still being pushed today

Weird how the lady that had her kids taken away associated with "QANON" was named Cynthia ABCUG

Weird how if you change G to numbers you get 7 or ABCU7

Weird how Babyfist was the board owner of the board /ABCU8/

Weird how Jim Watkins was photographed with QAnon Shaman Aka "Jake Angelli" aka "Jacob Chansley"

Austin Steinbart released from Jail 04/16/2021

Doge first appearance 05/29/2021

B post on /Dcomms/ 05/29/2021

Doge & Babyfist were posting from Same IP address

https://www.insider.com/baby-q-released-from-prison-after-harassment-campaign-2021-4

He gets out of jail, re-establishes contacts, sets up the plan to grift. Goes right back at it.

>>16486368 < Doge

>>16486575 < Babyfist

>>16486569 < Doge

Austin and Babyfist caught literally having a astroturf conversation in the "JIM AMA" bread.

>>16486368 < Doge

>>16486575 < Babyfist

>>16486569 < Doge

Austin and Babyfist caught literally having a astroturf conversation in the "JIM AMA" bread. Pretending they are not working together but as pointed out

Sharing IP address ->>16501424, >>16501427

Running Deepdigs ->>16501431, >>16501511

Colluding with Jim on /Squirrel/ ->>16501445

Inviting anons to a discord (just like buffalo groomers) ->>16501458

Flint, Babyfist, Doge all in comms with each other ->>16501499

Jim says let's have an AMA over the evidence he is connected to Doge/Austin/Babyfist, here are the responses

>>>/qresearch/16485913

>TYB

Question 1

>>>/qresearch/16485912 (Deleted by BV)

>Talk to us about all of this.

JW Response

>>>/qresearch/16485936

>I don't know Jacob Chansley (Angeli)

>He asked me a question at the Qcon during the question-and-answer period. I remember it was about child trafficking and he was a good speaker.

>There were about three million people in Washington DC on January 6 attending President Trump's speech, and marching to the Capital.

>>>/qresearch/16485941

>Bloody hands are also used by American Indian women to signify a silenced mouth and human trafficking.

Question 2

>>>/qresearch/16485931 (screenshots from the website SHAMAN Starseed - which connects MJ12/Austin S./QAnon Shaman/Baron of Arizona/B is for Baron)

JW Response

>>>/qresearch/16485948

>Wow, you spend to much time being a Jim groupie. That time could be better spent getting some tendies, or going outside.

Question 3

>>>/qresearch/16485970

>Or tell us why you thought it was a funny joke to invoke Kappy in the Meta thread a few nights ago, when you have direct connection to the person rumored to be behind his death?

JW Response

>>>/qresearch/16485998

>Brother, you need some help? I don't believe your sources have been honest with you.

>I'm not the key to this puzzle. Ask the guy in the bug costume some of this. He might understand more.

>I'm not a qanon personality. In fact I am suspicious of those that call themselves that, because you know.

>Q and anon etc. I believe the Soros and Media matters are behind weaponizing qanon, and gullible people like Steinbart, are there to fall into the trap.

Question 4

>>>/qresearch/16486017 (Response Showing Jim is connected to Shoenberger, and did invoke Isaac Kappy)

JW Response

>>>/qresearch/16486039

>Your chi is weak.

>The true qanon jenkum will give you your strength back.

Question 5

>>>/qresearch/16486051

>If Doge and BabyFist have no connection why did Doge bake the first ever bread on /deepdigs/ and why does Babyfist connecte to that board?

JW Response

>>>/qresearch/16486063

>I'm sick of reading your same crap over and over again, and yet it doesn't get deleted, because you are a low grade shill. Drink up and enjoy the savory aroma.

>They are users of this website. They have no access other than user-level like you.

>I'm certain the three-letter agencies post on this website and try to cause trouble.

Question 6

>>>/qresearch/16486061

Why did the B post happen on the Exact same day as Doge made his first appearance?

>>>/qresearch/16486130

>Don't overthink that. The B guy had access to Babyfist's computer and did that as a global volunteer. Babyfist was a volunteer then. He is not a volunteer now.

>I am not telepathic.

IP hashes have proven with sauce that Doge aka Austin was posting from the same IP address as Babyfist.

Question 7

>>>/qresearch/16486183

>Jim, how well do you know Thomas Schoenberger? How well do you know the company ShadowBox a rent cyber attack back larping company harrassing and pulling off psyops?

>or Silent Partner, a subverted company inside that company?

>When you interviewed did you not know?

>Or do you still not know?

>If you know now will you disavow Thomas?

No Response

Question 8

>>>/qresearch/16486195 Anon

>Jim, why did you interview someone who makes "music for infants" that has "hidden messages" in it?

>>>/qresearch/16486289 JW

>You seem to know more about him than I do.

>>>/qresearch/16486295 Anon

>All I did was google his name, Jim. You spoke to him for over an hour. How do you know him? Why did you interview him?

>>>/qresearch/16486325 JW

>Do you watch my show? I talk to all sorts of people. If it is any consolation, I barely remember the interview because I didn't get along with him.

Question 9

>>>/qresearch/16486145

>1. Do you acknowledge that babyfist and/or someone associated with him used his global volunteer account to post on Q's private board?

>2. Do you acknowledge that you fired babyfist for this reason?

>3. If you fired babyfist for this reason, do you acknowledge that a global volunteer posting on a private board goes against your internal policies for GV's?

>4. Did you investigate how this was allowed to happen? Did you ask babyfist who made the unauthorized post?

>5. Re: 'that is not my board to edit.' It was not babyfist's board to edit either. Why was nothing done beyond firing babyfist?

JW Response

>>>/qresearch/16486257

>Well, sounds like you have been listening to the shills who keep asking these questions, even after I have answered them. Some of them on this very thread. I'm not going to waste cycles retyping it. Read the back log.

>Go to Tora3.com/newsnetwork and look at the video on February 17. It includes a conversation with babyfist. It's the one the shills always say is porno. You know the image. It gets posted a lot.

>Don't ask again. I am not going to answer again.

Question 10

>>>/qresearch/16486332 Anon

>Jim, if a landlord broke into a tenant's house without the tenant's permission and took a shit on their bed, should he not clean it up?

>Why is it ok to delete things on this board, which belongs to all anons, but it's not ok to delete a post on a private board, that was made by someone other than the Board Owner?

>Unless you believe the Board Owner (Q) is the same person as the one who made the "B" post (babyfist's "fren") why would you leave the post up?

>>>/qresearch/16486382 JW

>Fuck off scatophile.

>>>/qresearch/16486456 Anon

>That was a legit question - not a scatophile post.

>The reasoning behind the B post remaining hasn't ever been fully explained.

>And it matters because of Q's history detailed in the drops of how he reacts to board fuckery of that kind.

>>>/qresearch/16486492 JW

>It's not my board, and I dealt with it as I did.

>I made that decision, and I am not going to change it. Q can come back and delete it if he wants.

Question 11

>>>/qresearch/16486275

>Are you aware of a warrant canary question's existence?

>>>/qresearch/16486411 JW

>I don't play that warrant canary game.

Warrant Canary is at the bottom of every bread, how could Jim not know this?

>>16514882

>I knew it, hivemind are ones trying to cast doubt

>KILL YOURSELF!

Since Dan frequents /HM/ I guess you are technically correct