>Anons used to be all about using logic.
It's gonna suck when these new Q posts are shown to be fake…because all the people that pushed it, will lose any credibility they had.
Which will tarnish any previous work they've done.
Hell, it'll tarnish the whole Q deal. Having some of the most "trusted" voices falling for a ruse is a bad look.
>Maybe that was the point. MSM running stories all over all ready that "Q has Returned."
Definitely crossed my mind. Some people's proofs for legitimacy are pretty good, but there's still enough doubt around it that everyone really should take a beat, relax, and let things play out a bit more. Too many are being consumed by the emotion of the idea that Q is back…and are letting it override logic.
If they're right and it's legit, great. I just don't want to see well-intentioned people get played for a fool. That's how MSM gets so many people to believe them…playing off the emotions of well-intentioned people.
>copy/pasta much
Negative. Didn't copy any of it from anywhere, and definitely typed it myself. Hope you're not someone that does decodes…because they'd terrible.
>Come on guys, let's see what the rally holds for clues.
This was where my head was when the legitimacy of Q's posts were brought up. However, it just means someone will scour Trump's rally, find something they can interpret as "proof" regardless. This is the problem. Emotion is trumping logic in those that tout their critical thinking ability.
>Q would expect us to be skeptical of the new posts. We should wait and see how things develop in the next few days.
This. That's a pretty simple, yet solid, point that continues to be dismissed.
>There is NOTHING to indicate that the latest posts are fake. If these new posts are fake, they are all fake.
There's plenty. Your inability to consume information and process it in an efficient manner isn't my problem.
>agreed. logic.
>yet the shills are trying their best to sow discord since Q hasn't performed a parlor trick for them.
Yep. They respond with such visceral anger because you dare question the validity of the new posts by requiring more proof. It's like you asked them to slap their mother and shit in her mouth. In a lineup with liberals you couldn't tell them apart…because they're all raging over being questioned.
>Do not confuse shills with anons.
Well, I can tell you firsthand that an anon can be perceived as a shill real damn quick. I've been here for-fucking-ever without ever being called a shill. I just happen to question the validity of these new Q posts, which is apparently an abomination, and now I'm a "shill." REEEEEEing at me like a liberal being told they can't kill babies anymore.