Well, good to see the tripcode poster is back. Very good chance it's Q.

But, remember the "B" post on /projectdcomms/? Did Q delete them? How can we reinforce AUTH?

>>16515584

Are you saying the site owners have the tripcode and are currently posting with it?

>>16515653

Well that's convenient. Is the salt rotation scheduled? Q's tripcodes have historically been:

Tripcode: ITPb.qbhqo - Password: Matlock

Tripcode: UW.yye1fxo - Password: M@tlock!

Tripcode: xowAT4Z3VQ - Password: Freed@m-

Tripcode: 2jsTvXXmXs - Password: F!ghtF!g

Tripcode: 4pRcUA0lBE - Password: NowC@mes

Tripcode: CbboFOtcZs - Password: StoRMkiL

Tripcode: A6yxsPKia. - Password: WeAReQ@Q

(source https://pastebin.com/P1g5RPWs)

plus I remember "WWG@WG@!" referenced somewhere

There is a disappointing possibility Watkins is posting as Q now if the salt is conveniently changed

>>16515548

Agreed. As a key issue of tripcode poster's return,BUMP

I am not convinced. The salt rotation is a perfect coincidence. Q's original password would not output the "!!Hs1Jq13jV6" tripcode at the time of those posts, only some other password would.

NEED EXTERNAL AUTHENTICATION

>>16515969

>>16515969

>>16515969

>>16515976

Can you answer his question then? How do we authenticate the identity of the tripcode poster, especially after a convenient secure tripcode salt rotation?

>>16515968

External auth needed, anon. Not another display of site ownership.