Anonymous ID: 4ec1c0 June 6, 2018, 12:33 p.m. No.1652062   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2075

>>1651250

A couple of thoughts on this. But first, thanks Anon for posting!

 

1) is anyone surprised that a member of the Royal Family is implicated in any way in pedophelia or trafficking?

 

2) 10 years ago, the Roths-controlled media would have never let this story see the light of day. Is it possible that the Roths are finally making the move AGAINST the Royal Family? There was a recent MSM opinion piece about why Charles' ascension is not only irrelevant, but counter to what the Crown stands for…specifically calling out his disbelief in the Church of England. It was a COMPLETE hit piece against the Future King of England, that was designed to leave readers questioning the relevance of the Royal Family altogether. It makes sense. For the U.K. to FULLY surrender to the United States of Europe, and ultimately the one-world-dominion, Brits must turn on the Crown unconditionally.

 

So, it's this Anon's belief that Roths, et al, have begun their coup against the Royals. Not that I have ANY love for the Windsors, but given the alternative, I hope they fight like hell to oppose their attempted takedown. Perhaps, there is at least ONE of them, that isn't compromised. Alas, if they are ALL compromised by pedohilia, Luciferianism, or other scandal that the Brits HAVE no other choice but to condemn, then their days are done. But, for example, if Harry's worst, "sin" is partying, smoking pot and dressing like a SS officer at Halloween, then there is hope. And maybe, the Royal Family can rebuild their reputation based on an effort to move to being VIRTUOUS representatives of the People.

 

Thoughts?

Anonymous ID: 4ec1c0 June 6, 2018, 12:40 p.m. No.1652113   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2126 >>2262 >>2558

>>1652067

Off subject, but I have thoughts on the word, "optics." Optics, refers to the gathering of light. It is purely a scientific term.

 

Obama made the term famous, by purposely using it to replace the word, "perception." It is a deceitful term. To illustrate my point; "the optics of the decision," means to the listener, "what the decision LOOKS like." But, "the PERCEPTION of the decision," means to the listener, "what the people BELIEVE."

Anonymous ID: 4ec1c0 June 6, 2018, 1:06 p.m. No.1652340   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1652126

Just pointing out social engineering and when people like Obama are the social engineers, they're just lying mofo's attempting to sway people away from the truth. That's all. I wasn't being argumentative.

Anonymous ID: 4ec1c0 June 6, 2018, 1:18 p.m. No.1652446   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1652178

Been doing it for a while. I maintain that we should spend some bread and build a whole chain of islands, 11.9 miles apart all the way from Japan to China so the Chinese can't navigate the water without violating Japan's boundaries KEK

Anonymous ID: 4ec1c0 June 6, 2018, 1:30 p.m. No.1652555   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1652242

And…are fucking IRATE that their vast voter fraud was STILL not enough to get HER elected. I can't wait to see the voter fraud lengths they will go to, to try and prevent the REdWave.