Anonymous ID: 0aecec June 25, 2022, 7:17 p.m. No.16521146   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1158


Do you even run a business?

If I had a website that invited people to come store their very own home away from homes from me, I'd have a system in place to allow those people who don't come often access to their home away from home with very little ease. If I wanted to stay in business, the last thing I would do would be to change the locks and not exempt those who haven't been home in awhile. It's just bad business.


Drop the bullshit and hmu and we discuss how this might show that Jim in fact may be in communique with Q.

Anonymous ID: 0aecec June 25, 2022, 7:37 p.m. No.16521389   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1462


Like Jim said, Q was whitelisted from salts. This is what you would expect from a website dealing with dormant accounts.


Not whitelisted from salts when active, but whitelisted from salts when dormant, "long ago" (according to Jim). You can keep pretending this isn't true, but it's what Jim said, and it fits with standard business practices. Can you prove otherwise with something other than "but muh salts didn't work that way in the past"?

Anonymous ID: 0aecec June 25, 2022, 7:42 p.m. No.16521462   🗄️.is 🔗kun


I'm not making this shit up. You can try to convince us that Jim is, but you'll fail without proof and so far all you have is a team of shills saying and doing the same fucking thing

they've been doing forever now, and that destroys your credibility.

>>16514077 (pb)

Anonymous ID: 0aecec June 25, 2022, 7:52 p.m. No.16521571   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1598


Jim said it's WHOLLY WHITELISTED. Stop pretending he didn't. What he said makes sense if you're trying to run a business. PROVE OTHERWISE OR STFU.

saying the same thing over and over and over again doesn't make it true.