>>16522370 lb
I'm just asking you what the point of bringing it up was if all you can do is say, "it's out there. just trust me!" We can't feasibly verify it, so why should we trust you?
I just wanted to see it. If you can't find it, that's fine.
>>16522370 lb
I'm just asking you what the point of bringing it up was if all you can do is say, "it's out there. just trust me!" We can't feasibly verify it, so why should we trust you?
I just wanted to see it. If you can't find it, that's fine.
>autists
Sorry, anon, but there aren't anons like that around here these days. If you went to half much lately, you could see a huge difference. Most of the time I spent on boards when not here over the past two years was spent on /pol/ and it is far, far better than I remember this place being after 2019.
There aren't even many frens left on /pol/. It's mostly just /leftypol/, feds, faggots from reddit and shareblue niggers all trying to demoralize us. I'd say the amount of people that still come here and are seriously contributive like those on /pol/ is a small fraction of the ratio that exists regularly on /pol/.
Sorry, but it's been maybe three years since frens have really hung around here. Don't even take my word for it; go check out /pol/ for a few days and see how you feel.
It's weird you'd rather sit here and argue instead of celebrating that /ourguys/ have turned on the fun machine again.
Calm down, anon.
What do you think Russia has been doing in Ukraine?
We live in a time of suspended Truth, anon, an era of Schrodinger's Truth. If you want something to be real, make it real. If you want the certainty that comes with Knowing, obtain it through hard work and discipline.
Do you really know what's real anymore?
>What happened to "trust but verify"? Everyone ditched the verify part.
The whole argument, from my side, that the burden of verifying was too prohibitive and that bringing it up in the first place was futile because doing so was way too demanding.
I just wanted to see Bill break down the factions. We don't have to argue for an hour about it kek
>help the newfags not be newfags
Yeah, and we should dry some water while we're at it.
I'd guess we're already past that point.
For (You), anon.
Very cool. The first image looks like the battery-powered lamp schematic found in Egypt (likely the Ever-Burning Lamp of Hathor).
It's attainable, anon. The problem is many, even here, when plenty seem to be closer to the Truth, seem to be unwilling to take those steps and develop the amnesia necessary to be more in tune with it.
ty fren
>kids won't be safe if we can't murder them!
Actually, what I was saying was /pol/ is generally better than here kek
But we can agree this place is pretty taxing and diluted.
Overwatch character.
Jim generally comes off as incompetent and aloof more than anything dubious. With that being said, his evangelical appeals, also coincidentally Q's greatest bane, made him immediately disappointing for me.
If you look for sensible thoughts that follow one another in our opponents, you just may be a bigger fool than any of them. None of them know what they really want and they're all in a polarized, reactive trance that was not generated by their hand, but simply befell them along the way.
Is it really their fault all of them got duped?
The truth is, anon, none of us are on any "sides", but it sure is our duty to rescue all of those that are lost and don't know how to help themselves.
ngl I've definitely done that and it does disarm people and also work. If he's just smarter than me and I don't see though it, more props to him. I'm just not that confident in him now, especially since Ron sort of abandoned us to run for office. I suppose I wish him well and everything, but it's hard not to feel scorned here.
To be fair, I can see why Ron would evade those questions or provocations.