Anonymous ID: 85050c June 25, 2022, 10:10 p.m. No.16523329   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3344

>>16523237

>Logically…

 

It's illegal to do a full-scale abortion ban, because that would be the government showing deference to a single religion, and a sect of a religion, at that. Muslims have a 120 day (before "it's a life"/the soul enters the body/it's officially people) standard. Jews claim "Life at First Breath", because Adam parallels… which makes "up to birth" abortions illegal for the same reason; especially considering that THAT IS the Biblical Standard, "officially".

 

What?

 

Murder is already illegal, and doesn't need to have any attachment to religion.

 

  • Logically, a full-scale abortion ban would just be recategorizing abortion as murder, which again doesn't need to have anything to do with religion.

Anonymous ID: 85050c June 25, 2022, 10:24 p.m. No.16523457   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3750

>>16523401

 

I mean, they are living cells. How/why does that even need to be defined? They are animated, with intrinsic purpose(to continue to live).

 

Single celled organisms are also alive.

 

The relevant distinction is not how complex the living organism is/isn't. We kill living things(simple and complex alike) all the time, everyday, and don't consider those actions murder.

 

The relevant distinction is that the life is human, and killing that life is(should be) categorically(legally) murder.