No one has a soft spot for Blacks except Whites. Globalists cannot get rid of Blacks until they get rid of Whites first, because otherwise Whites would stop them.
So Blacks are used to destroy Whites, who are in turn the only people effectively, that keep the other races from just taking whatever they want from Black lands without compunction or remorse.
Blacks are in the way.
They are unable to take care of themselves.
But they are useful to the globalists for a time, to harm Whites.
"White supremacist" ideology is simply that Whites should be able to exist, and self-rule, like every other people are entitled to, and should be entitled to.
When we talk to our White brothers to increase realisation of this truth, our only desire is to see people better aligned to life and the universe… of realising the importance of life, and sustaining it.
Beliefs bashed out of them by a century of anti-natal, anti-White media and culture, poured down their throats by people that hate them, and want them destroyed.
There is no reason for anyone to be against "White supremacists" if they value the rights of White people, and White people being able to exist.
And note, none of the above means harming or hating non-Whites is required. Simply something less than complete ambivalence towards, or embrace of harm towards, Whites.
It is not called "supremacism" when any other race aligns towards their own rights and existence.
This should be telling for anyone that looks at the issue honestly.
There was no society more perverted than Weimar Germany. The National Socialists ended it.
If they wanted the perversions to remain, as, as you allege, they were so perverted themselves, there would have been no need to cleanse their society of such things, or overturn and ban the system and people that were producing such things.
As always, you rely on absolute ignorance of the reality of Weimar Germany and National Socialism in your propaganda.
But this makes your propaganda inherently weaker than propaganda that sticks to the truth.
The National Socialists were moral, and desired a moral society. They fought the same people, the same conditions and the same immorality then, as we face today. Which is why we were arranged to fight and defeat them. And why we are in such a mess today.
Anyone can pick images of marginalised people, and present them as lesser. But the truth is, you are picking pictures of people that live in Jewish ruled societies, not under the control or influence of National Socialism.
Look to how the National Socialists dressed in Germany, and the standards they demanded of their men and women. That is the influence they sought to spread.
A desire for people to look, behave and align with behaviour closest to how an early 20th century devout churchgoer would expect of the members of their community. People looking and doing their best.
Skin-head culture is not, in this regard, in alignment with National Socialism at all… but like I said, under conditions of poverty, harm and judaic influence, in societies controlled by deeply propagandised and misled Whites, (& cultural, religious and racial aliens), historically illiterate, and Judaic influenced, this is the kind of thing you may see.
You don't see "Nazis" dressed well, and acting normally, simply because when you see such people you do not assume them to be Nazis. This is your conditioning. But the vast majority of us walk past you, indistinguishable from any other good, moral and decent person in society, in look. It is the knowledge in our heads that separates us, and our morality, and strength, not our outward appearance.
100% of supposed "Nazi" gay iconography is created by Jews.
For pretty obvious reasons too.
And BTW, kids with their arms around each other, or standing in overalls, shows nothing but ordinary cute kids involved in, or doing nothing untoward.
Unlike kids being taken to drag queen story time, vigorously defended by (((who)))?
More Jewish perversions.
And need we proof?
Which is the one saving and presenting such photos, are you after all a Nazi?
No. You are not. I am. But I am not the one presenting such photos. A person critical of 'Nazis' is, desperate to slander them.
The angles there pretty much lay themselves out for all to see do they not?
Perversion is your deal, your people, not mine.
"The first homosexual movement thrived in Germany from the late nineteenth century until 1933. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_homosexual_movement
Gee, I wonder what happened in 1933?
Give it a rest Schlomo, all that can happen in this discourse is that people can see on one side a National Socialist who is truthful and decent, and his oppose desperate, slanderous, and loose with the truth.
Do you think that ultimately serves your people and your cause? Exposing 'Nazis' as being far more decent and honourable than yourself, and your people, via your behaviour?
Foreknowledge. They took the cruise to see the blow struck against the people and civilisation they hate.