You're suffering from a mental disorder.
You're trying to sneak in 'fake Q' narrative using dialectic inversion.
When did you conclude this would work on anyone?
Which Democrats?
Fear of being killed by mass shooters?
Can tell by the smearing of the site as 'compromised'.
>My thoughts are in line
With your own axiomatic logic of dividing yourself from humanity first such that you 'see' a benevolence of it, when in truth it has held humanity back for the sake of those trying to divide from humanity to rule it.
Your logic self refutes, it is one destructive psychological projection masquerading as 'historical insight'.
It only 'persists' when the sources of the dialectic are trusted as speaking about anyone or anything other than their own warped minded selves.
Your post self refutes.
Where's the GitHub link
Every time these events happen, Anon always considers the top female as the winner of the competition, and the claim to victory by the male as illegitimate.
Too bad, I was going to prank call you.
Muh victim narrative to cover muh attack narrative masquerading as legit Anon narrative.
That's why trip code exists.
>https://ncio.ca/briefings/index.php/2021/07/10/supreme-court-of-canada-justice-implicated-un-and-who-in-targeted-murders-of-barry-honey-sherman
BOOM notable nom
>https://ncio.ca/briefings/index.php/2021/07/10/supreme-court-of-canada-justice-implicated-un-and-who-in-targeted-murders-of-barry-honey-sherman/
"The murders were “a very, very sophisticated crime, in my view, committed by a very sophisticated organization – at least it has those hallmarks.”
Did not 'implicate 'by name.
Why the ask to waste time?