"The Honorable Rod J. Rosenstein"
How can I trust anything past that ridiculous salutation!
-Kek
Gravity is proven, not accepted in mainstream science because they have something to gain from obscuring its nature.
Perhaps it is easy to overcome it, or get free energy by understanding it.
The science has been done, look and be observant.
The superkamiokande experiment was sabotaged, ask yourself why.
read the documentation about the experiment and what it proved.
Nutrinos have mass. They "are" antimatter as we define it.
Science is full of bullshit, but the observations are out there, and science that gets "silenced" is the loudest truths.
No textbook has ever been allowed to be written with truth in it, about hardly any subject.
Do not expect the cosmos to be explained in a "cabal textbook".
But the writing and findings are out there…
Keyword super kamiokande, nutrino.
Start there.
pretty conclusive in my opinion.
I almost had believed in gravity when I saw a plane crash, but this is way more proof here anon!
-kek
Helium does not defy gravity.
It displaces atoms with those which are farther apart, gravity affects the greater mass (non helium) particles more, allowing the helium to rise due to larger atom size.
Nothing to do with defiance.
Humid air also rises. Warm "anything" rises, because it is larger than cold "anything" (of same matter).
Simple observations guys.
(I need to drop out of this discussion…)
When things FLOAT in water, gravity still has an effect on them also.
It is acting on molecules of different masses in different degrees, this is obvious also.
I did not say a theory could be proven.
I said it cannot be DISPROVEN.
Big fuckin difference.
You do not want to observe your surroundings, then you are welcome to remain in your dome as long as you like.
The dome which defies gravity right…
>It moves AWAY from gravity
WRONG.
It moves towards the planet or it would move to the vacuum and it does not. It only moves to the point where it is offset by the other atoms captured in the field.
Under your logic, hot air defies gravity. And it does not just jump into space, it takes it rightful place in the striation of which the atoms align.
Same concept with any atoms, of any density.
It's how you know 'he is next'…
Direction is irrelevant.
Mass is relevant.
up or down is not relevant -just where the mass equilibrium is.
If you are not really trying to understand then I will leave you alone. I have researched for many years, and do not accept the mainstream textbook science answer (or lack thereof). Trying to help, but only if you are interested.
Not claiming expertise in the bible here, but define a firmament.
FIRMament can meant the ground.
Waters are above it (lakes/oceans/clouds/rain/etc)
Waters are below it (underground)
Or it can be waters (ICE) in space, that would still be above…
Kinda oddly vague.
Just sayin'
Gravity PUSHES from all sides equally.
(assuming no mass in field)
Enter a planet.
Now gravity pushes to the surface because it lacks as much "strength" passing thru. So your feet get a little less PUSH than your head will get (assuming you stand up).
So you are pushed to the planet's surface.
The more mass you have, the greater the difference. (both for planet, and yourself as an object)
Stay with me, this is your answer:
When the moon is factored in, and directly overhead, you will weigh less, because the moon absorbs some of the gravity that would have struck you on the head. Now, move yourself under the earth surface to a point where the "middle" of the moon plus earth would be. (this is where the torroidal molten core is). When being at the center of the moon+earth combined, you would be weightless. Go down a little further, and you would move UPward. This is what keeps the earth from cooling.
(the moon, and gravity working together)
Otherwise, nothing moves UP with gravity, but may move up due to other interactions that may or may not involve gravity.
During the "golden age of saturn" there was said to be ice crystals in the atmosphere that were disturbed by the faulting of the orbit of mars and the otherwise lined up planets.
(see "symbols of an alien sky" and the "electric universe" theories/videos)
Could this be the dome they speak of?
If so, it was supposedly the cause of raining flood and creations of oceans…
And at that early time, only the northern hemisphere would have been subjected to sunlight, so anything southern was darkness and may not been inhabited.
(see vids for more info of course)
That's not going to age well…
There is another video:
"A funny thing happened on the way to the moon"
That's a fun watch too.
I personally have researched FE back years ago, when I was a novice truther.
I do think there is something to the legends, but they refer to ancient interpretations & observations, such as "symbols of an alien sky" talks about. (north pole axis observations of mars/venus/saturn/etc. appearing as gods)
(which is very scientific and a very good watch)
But I am convinced the earth is "mostly round" not a perfect ball by no means. And some of the "proofs" of FE come from the anomalous squish the earth has due to the moon giving it a little wide hips over a long time of zipping around it. Others are simply observations of half truths, such as event horizon photographs taken from 30ft elevation, but citing the math of being at sea level when 30ft elevation actually proves a curved surface.
To each his own, but gravity is something I have studied and "nutrino push" gravity theory is the only one so far that explains everything from black holes, to the expanding universe.
>Warm engine blocks do not rise more than cold engine blocks. That error/example is self explanatory.
Actually YES.
displaced- in comparison the warm one would float more (it would be "larger" at a molecular level)… ANY matter would react this way except WATER. It is the only odd substance that floats when frozen.
Obviously I am not saying warm objects just float in the air.
Suspended in a medium however it would be measured to be true.
>Thermal Dynamics may not be your strong suit.
(IT IS)
Although you are correct in assuming thermal conductivity.
But that was not the discussion, it was about warmer vs colder matter.
Kek-