>>16535437 (lb)

I didn't see it that way, but I do see what you are getting at. I was never good at the date/time stuff, so always just leaned on "making connections" or wrestling over ideas and basically being ignored over twitter, lol. It's not bad to have digestible ideas out there - it's sort of a focus, actually. It's also not bad to have anons do their trig calculations on time stamps. I do think that at some point the message should be louder than the exorbitant efforts to mathematically prove Q. It's not like we weren't way past the need for proofs long ago.

>>16535629

>Instead of focusing on the message in the words, and the fact that multiple people that understand the tripcode process and how it works are vouching for the posts' authenticity, I'm here to use bold text to make some nonsensical point about how I plan to verify the authenticity of something way beyond my purview, let alone control.

You either dig the new drops or you don't. The choice is (and always has been) yours.

>>16535655

That's a really neat photo.