Yeah, imagine using anything in pop culture that could relate to people on an emotional level to help open their mind to the possibility that Truth lies outside of their perceivable realities. You're not going to precipice all over the board, now, are you?
Yes.
>Separation of Church and State doesn't mean anything, Constitutionally.
It means the state will not establish a religion.
>Only reference to that sentence fragment is in a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association who had written President Jefferson that they felt the state of Connecticut viewed their right to practice their faith as a "state given right". Jefferson replied in a general response that there should always be a "wall of separation between church and state".
Absolutely right because Jefferson wasn't your typical religi-cuck as was mainstream during his time.
>Like Roe, and everything else these filth lie about, there is no truth to anything they claim is in the Constitution. Because it simply isn't in there.
Since your are so passionate about redefining the defined for the sake of whatever argument it is you are trying to make, I'll ask:
What religion do you prefer to make the official state one since you're so opposed to the idea conveyed behind the Constitutionally backed phrase "Separation Of Church And State"?
>"Separation" of Church & State sought to eliminate the obligatory tax to an entity that guides the soul not governs the physical.
And the Founding Fathers intended that each would be able to worship God (or not how you want them to, or not at all) as they saw fit. There were multiple denominations seeking "God" in the new world by the time the Bill of Rights was drafted. Some have even theorized that the original text said "denomination" (implying that all believed in God, regardless) but the explicit wording preventing the Gov't from establishing one means that no belief should be enforced by law, nor should the law be allowed to tell someone how they should practice.