Anonymous ID: 4f4f55 June 27, 2022, 1:40 p.m. No.16538922   🗄️.is 🔗kun

.>>16538910

 

I believe people are insinuating that Jim is in on the con somehow, so unfortunately his input would hold no weight at that point.

Anonymous ID: 4f4f55 June 27, 2022, 1:42 p.m. No.16538943   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8950 >>8958

>>16538917

 

So what discernment would be applicable in this situation? Q has on several occasions used photos to prove he is the same origin source when there was doubt. Why would he not have the same approach if it is indeed the same person/ group?

Anonymous ID: 4f4f55 June 27, 2022, 1:46 p.m. No.16538967   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8987

>>16538958

So it doesn't matter at all if the drops are from an actual mil intel source, or some basement dwelling loser. Right, lets just follow along and stop asking questions, genius.

Anonymous ID: 4f4f55 June 27, 2022, 1:52 p.m. No.16539002   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9081

>>16538987

The messenger is literally what gives the message credibility. How many LARPs have existed claiming to have "inside" info? How many actually did? There's a reason why Q is known world wide. The source is everything.