Anonymous ID: 5563f4 June 27, 2022, 2:09 p.m. No.16539126   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9191 >>9209 >>9216

>>16539103

>You say you can masquerade as any trip;

no

the other anon made the accurate observation that the site admin (and anyone else with that level of login credential) can masquerade as any trip they want too

 

that anon did not claim to be able to do so themselves

or that -any anon- would be able to do so

they said it would be possible for the site admin to do so

 

5:5?

Anonymous ID: 5563f4 June 27, 2022, 2:27 p.m. No.16539249   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9278

>>16539209

>I literally feel like you and me and a handful of others are the only actual people here

thats how little traffic there is here

even given the fact that "muhQ" posts hit all the aggregators

 

think about it

if the posts were legit

and anon "concensus" (kek) supported it

 

would there be e-bakes today?

or would there be so many bakers ready to bake we would have to take a number and get in line to see who "get to bake" next

 

reconcile

use logic

 

think for yourself

Anonymous ID: 5563f4 June 27, 2022, 2:34 p.m. No.16539305   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9342

>>16539278

>look at my first post after believing Q was back

kek

I know anon

I was on the same train, kek

 

salt fiasco +TOR +no delta's/ attempts at actual re-confirmation after 1.5 year absence and change of BO on /qr/ left me goingโ€ฆ

dafuq?