I hear ya, but I'm not upset with Q over that drop.
Because it came from Fake Q and not Real Q.
#VerificationOrGTFO
You clearly don't grasp the tech behind Salt/TC implementations.
2 things lead me to call it F&G:
-
The Friday "Q" drops were made after a Salt rotation (confirmed by others with TCs & later by Jim).
This means Q's old TC could not have been used as it would have been different once he entered his pwd.
Therefore, those posts were F&G since they had Q's prev Salt TC.
-
It has been revealed that site admins can change code that would convert a specific pwd entered into Q's TC.
That's a yuge red flag that becomes a distinct possibility because of what happened in 1.
#VerificationOrGTFO
Agreed.
And after the obvious fuckery explained in my prev post, it's absolutely mandatory verification take place.
Otherwise, it's 100% fuckery for sure since Q's TC could not have been used Friday under those technical conditions.
I have a feeling verification won't be happening.
Contrary to what Fake Q said, it didn't have to be this way.
Well stated.
Only a 0-delta verification with Q saying I was just testing you guys could save things at this point.
And even then I'd be like gee thanks Q about it.
But, at least it would be Real Q and not the fuckery of all fuckerys Fake Q.
The last update I saw JW said he would report on it Tuesday after he got back home.
Not sure if there's been a newer update since.
Well, here's the thing to consider.
Prior to January of this year, Jim didn't comm to the board much at all.
And, in the OG days it was CM that did all the talking every once in a while.
So, inconclusive is the best answer.
Yep, no shortage of ad hom attacks.
Big time shortage of explaining how "Q" could make a post Friday with the old TC after the Salt was rotated.
>TOR
I'll trade you one of my apples for one of your oranges.
You can't get the same TC from your pwd as before after a Salt Rotation.
Simple as.