>>16541019
notable
>>16541019
notable
>Notice #3619 talk about salt rotation etc.
very relevent series of drops imo
the trip confirmed drop comes as part of a series
where Q re-verified his own trip-codeAFTERa required salt rotation when 8kun went live
new trip verified via anon interaction
-not sure about "legality" of trip verifying over TOR
DARPA created TOR so its a government utility, no?
kek
>And it drives home the point that Q can't directly establish his identity.
>It must be done by coincidence or plausible deniability.
and when Q does so it looks like pics related
Q calls out the delta FIRST
DJT posts on the exact delta that was called
anons confirm via creation of proofs
>new trip confirmed via anon interaction
TOR posting
>TOR posters ids remain 000000 when linked or moused over
not when linked from another bread
Q's Latest Posts
Saturday 06.25.2022
>>16521604 rt >>16520866, >>16521137 ββ Established. (Who was "Jane Roe"? 50 years of conditioning.)
Friday 06.24.2022
>>16506930 ββββββββββββββββ Are you ready to serve your country again? Remember your oath.
>>16505677 rt >>16505361 ββββββββββ It had to be done this way.
>>16504957 ββββββββββββββββ Shall we play a game once more?
chek'm
mouse over
has an ID
click on the link and go to the bread
all zero's
exactly this
anon interacton or bust
Q calls the shot (calls the delta)
DJT knocks it out of the part (posts on the exact delta)
anon go wild (create delta proofs)
Q tags anon created delta proof
Q is confirmed via anon interaction
>Q is confirmed via anon interaction
>Q is Q and Baker is Highest Ranking Anon (always)
the baker is literally a nigger
that is the DEFUALT starting position
are you talking like aβ¦
"whole buffalo"
kind of buffalo
because I will use the whole fucking buffalo if thats the reference you are looking for
>holy shit that really was Q posting on Hivemind
ohhhhh fuuuuuuuu
HE FUCKING SAID THE WORD CONFIRMED
that means confirmed right?
its signed with a Q
why WOULDNT I believe it?
>IF Q wants his trip to be same, it will be the same.
so you have never seen a salt rotation before anon?
look at this Q drop
what is Q's tripcode in this drop?
is it the same as Q's tripcode from the LAST drop?
nope
becuase it changed
due to a salt rotation
as discussed in the pic related
I would agree with you
IF
The salt had not rotated BEFORE the first new Q drop
the salt rotated
and THEN the new Q's dropped
with the pre-salt rotation tripcode
so either Q is completely invalidating the salt encrypted tripcode process entirely
or
those posts were fake and ghey
we are now 5 days and counting with no actual confirmation using long enstablished methods
I am not really on the fence anon
they were fake and gay
Dan Scavino tweeteting the babyfist.png 3 times in a row
3 days in a row
seals the deal for me
>Q has posted on the UK board a few times. Usually when something QR was fucked up.
this is true
>So then Q's trip code is not valid any longer. Q has to re-authenticate all over again and the old tripcode is worthless
5:5 anon
you got it
>Wait when and where was the 3rd baby fist?
>when
literally 4 minutes after Jim adressed the issue on sunday, with his flashing administrator flag
>where
he retweeted the one he tweeted on saturday
the first one was on friday, and was a truth social post
every single one the same babyfist.png
>Jim says stuff
>4 minutes after Jim Watkins Posts Dan Scavino re-tweets the Baby Fist
the mere idea of rotating the salt
and then rolling it back as soon as its discovered
is suspicious as FUCK
so you are just going to ignore the fact that he re-tweeted his own tweet with no comment
4 minutes after Jim addresses the issue using administrator flag?
must be one of those pesky coincidencesβ¦