Q has made it very obvious that the usage of coincidences do NOT violate National Security laws. See first 3 photos. Zero Deltas's are the safest way to confirm for anons (and "message not meant for anons")

However when I was looking over #3619 (4th photo) I noticed something alarming and idk how I have missed them after looking at this drop so much over the past few days.

Is Q saying National Security laws prohibit usage of TOR's to produce IDEN ? Isn't this what we have seen from "Q" over the last few days?

Notice #3619 talk about salt rotation etc.

Seems very relevant to this anon.

>>16541019

Anything breb posts you can literally just flush it down a motel bathroom

>>16541096

i actually felt sorry for this woman, i saw her try and fight back against the demon, but the demon won

>>16541107

Q laid us the proper frame work for how to confirm it's them. Those drops you posted are SUPER relevant because we are in the exact same situation. Notice the dates in these drops you posted vs when confirmation happened. We are still in the "very well could be Q" window but we still none the less need the confirmation now, the same way we did then.

I may dive into the legality of TOR and how it could relate to the trip.

>>16541139

we get it, can you chill