3 babyfist Dan Proof
Truth: https://truthsocial.com/users/DanScavino/statuses/108536460485249717
First Tweet: https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1540888763341176833
Re-Tweet (deleted): https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1541078103769944064
>assumption
I didnt make any claims anon
just proving the fact that Dan Scavino posted the same babyfist.png on social media
3 seperate times
3 seperate days
that is what this proof shows
3 babyfist Dan
do you refute this?
>looks like a claim
that Dan posted the babyfist.png 3 times
that is what the proof shows
does that looks like an assumption to you?
do you refute the fact that Dan posted the same babyfist.png 3 times?
sup patchfag
>and isn't just posting a reference to Roe V. Wade being overturned.
1 time could be anything
2 times and a day after? still could be coincidence
3 times and two days after? no, thats comms
I like patches
>assumption
1 time could be anything
2 times could be a coincidence
3 times is a signal
welcome to signals intelligence
>The website's still here.
from the last META bread
Jim:
Maybe I should just turn it off, and go apply for some neet bucks?
>>16458925 (Jim)
>UID: 18d324
>Maybe I should just turn it off, and go apply for some neet bucks?
>>16458821 (Jim)
>UID: 18d324
>Flashing Admin Flag