let's get vintage/simple, how about
calm before the storm
always felt a vibe of "how is this guy such a well-known actor, let alone a celebrity?" from Cusack.
there's a few (well, many, actually) others like that.
spook explains it well.
i'm with those who agree bakers can have some fun with notables (within reasonable limits, of course)
they're just temporary anyway, not that big a deal… it's gotten much better, but most of the drama over them is completely useless.
not me but it's obviously saucing the new twatter of the day, otherwise the post'd be ok
no, no, depends on the tweets.
no patience/respect left for the Dilleys, Sage, killrogue, EyeSpye, @Alice etc
>severely risk chasing away newfags
if only…
hopefully they'll learn, instead.
but seriously, it might seem rude and unfounded for you, but we've had months and months of these tactics, variations and debates: the "alt-info" twatters are tolerated on their dedicated thread, but inevitably slide the general, if only that (not saying anything of the deeper, nastyer reasons why they often exist in the first place).
current thread for that is
>>1587271 - @EyeTheSpy & @BackChannel17 Thread
good post of concrete info
the amount of fucks we should reasonably give about COMPD BO/BV is equal to the amount of Q posts between May 23rd and June 2nd 2018
please clap
bring the Gretel