>>1654437 <newfag's
just testing out his new "chan" word,
but doesn't actually know what sauce is.
poser or hoser? (You) decide.
Of course - treason & high crimes.
You don't understand how immunity works.
>He does actually and is 100%correct. You are a shill. Learn use immunity
Let me clarify for you. McCabe is a lawyer, and would be seeking transactional immunity (or as close as he can get). Use and derivative use immunity is worthless to him for the reasons OP stated, and he derives no benefit (and probable detriment) by testifying.
McCabe isn't seeking use immunity.