>>1654338
Hmmm. Kind of I guess. Lynch on the tarmac is going to be mentioned, and it is in the texts. If not in the IG it will open up another investigation.......That's the HRC video Q is mentioning. I am sure it will be evidence in some investigation at some point and then become public.
>>1654348
Which goes back to very early Q crumbs. Reynolds v the US.
But there is a state secret privilege loophole. The State Secret evidence is shown to the judge and the judge can decide if it is actually a state secret or if the SSP is being abused. if the judge determines it is an abuse of power to call the evidence a SS he can decide it can be admissible as evidence.