Anonymous ID: a73eb9 June 28, 2022, 11:58 p.m. No.16552769   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2777 >>2933

>>16552724

>the only Q to get a Zero Delta in 18 months with POTUS

i maintain that there are probably hundreds of anons that have gotten zero delta's with POTUS over the years. POTUS was posting a lot tonight, despite that 24 min gap. it wouldn't have been that difficult to achieve. which is why we verified Q with tripcode AND zero deltaโ€ฆ

 

reconcile these things:

 

>"Q" said "proof coming" and "Watch POTUS"afterthere was already a zero delta.. (almost 4 minutes later) .. which means this "Q" didn't realize it had already happened..

>Q has never posted a (you) screenshot before

>Q has never posted any image with a screenshot timestamp in the filename

>Q has never acknowledged any other board besides this one

 

notice the contradictions in "Q"'s thank you note

 

>This TRIP will never be used again.

>If any future posts are required we will re-confirm

 

>if any future posts are required

what does that mean? will there be future posts or no?

>we will re-confirm

reconfirm what? what was even confirmed? and why would you do it here?

 

you know what this sounds like to me? it sounds like someone bailing on a larp because it went south. and kissing your asses in the process so you won't question it.

Anonymous ID: a73eb9 June 29, 2022, 12:15 a.m. No.16552831   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2840 >>2846 >>2848

>>16552811

i too am an absolute retard, and i did know that about changing computer's timezone, but it still seems unlikely to me. do you remember this happening before? i always look at Q's filenames and i feel like i would've noticed if that had happened in the past

>>16552816

it's true that all of this is unprecedented. i'm just confused by what the purpose of it was, if it's real. they never even stated that the other posts over the weekend were fake and gay or gave us any future direction.. the real Q returning is a gigantic deal and i don't think they would do it this way..

>a post about the upcoming supreme court decision (similar to fake Q's one-off post about Jane Roe)

>a post containing stringers that could've easily been copypasta'ed from existing Q posts because they weren't unique

>a post thanking a subset of anons but, not all anons, for their efforts after an 18 month hiatusโ€ฆ

that's what the real Q wants to broadcast to the entire world after their return?

 

OR did babyfist and Jim decide that the larp is over and are trying to quietly shut this down because they've been caught?

Anonymous ID: a73eb9 June 29, 2022, 12:19 a.m. No.16552843   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2845 >>2849

>>16552840

no, that's not really implied at all. being locked out is not the same as being impersonated.. if anyone used Q's tripcode and Q returned, why wouldn't they explicitly state that the prior posts were fake? do you see how the vagueness is in line with the other fake Q's vagueness?

Anonymous ID: a73eb9 June 29, 2022, 12:34 a.m. No.16552933   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2944 >>3225

>>16552894

>>16552898

the real Q would have known that the fake Q would keep posting. would they prioritize mitigating this, knowing the impact it could have worldwide, or thanking OSS and team for their efforts? what makes more sense? do not be blinded by ego. if the real Q is still here, they can post, with another trip, and actually fight the impersonation, with real substantive information. instead it's a vague fake Q versus another vague Q.

 

don't forget the facts i laid out here.

>>16552769

especially this one.

>"Q" said "proof coming" and "Watch POTUS"afterthere was already a zero delta.. (almost 4 minutes later) .. which means this "Q" didn't realize it had already happened..

Anonymous ID: a73eb9 June 29, 2022, 12:47 a.m. No.16553013   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3027 >>3032 >>3037

>>16552987

the real Q could end this so easily. if they're here, why aren't they? why not post something substantial, refute the fake Q, and give anons future direction, the way they have ALWAYS done in past cases of board/site fuckery? instead, you're telling me the real Q came back to copy and paste a sentence from an article that came out this week, say "worth remembering", and then address the situation? does that not sound more like this fake Q to you? am i crazy?

Anonymous ID: a73eb9 June 29, 2022, 1:07 a.m. No.16553188   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3211 >>3225

>>16553120

yea i realized that after i posted.. the rest of the points that i've made still stand. i would love to be proven wrong.

 

>prove that Q has posted a screenshot of (you)'s before

>prove that Q has posted an image with a screenshot timestamp in the filename before (from which you can derive OS and timezone - whether spoofed or not)

>explain why Q said proof was coming after a zero-delta had already been established 4 minutes prior. was real Q taking a nap and didn't realize they had gotten the zero delta already?

 

i am convinced the tripcode Q in this bread is fake and gay based on the content of their posts alone, on top of all the fuckery from the past few days. i am not convinced the hivemind Q is real, unless someone can refute the above points or give me an alternate explanation that makes sense.

Anonymous ID: a73eb9 June 29, 2022, 1:15 a.m. No.16553235   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3242

>>16553229

what does it confirm anon? really, look at that objectively, and ask if anyone could do what was done, or if that requires military intelligence level clearance. if i were going to fake a stringer, i would do exactly what this Q has done. confirmation bias is a hell of a drug.

Anonymous ID: a73eb9 June 29, 2022, 1:20 a.m. No.16553271   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3278

>>16553242

o7, i'm sure it will be significant. this second Q didn't tell us anything new about it, just copy pasted a sentence from an article we're supposed to remember.

>btw, since when does Q do that? they usually link to the article

 

here it is by the way. i'm pretty sure jack posobiec was talking about this this week

 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/one-more-blockbuster-supreme-court-decision-could-still-be-coming-after-fridays-abortion-ruling